Quantum Foam vs Zero Point Energy

Zenth
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If you're familiar with these concepts, can you elaborate on: what quantum foam is, what zero point energy is, the difference between them, and their relationship ?

Seems like a loaded question, and it is, but I'm hoping to save a lot of time in research by simply asking knowledgeable folk to point me in the right direction. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you started with reading introductory articles such as Wikipedia etc? And then we can discuss the questions you might run into while reading such.
 
Indeed. Okay then at this point, my only question is for you to critique my shot at deriving a general explanation. Here goes:

Quantum foam is a general term to describe a microscopic infinite turbulence of random electromagnetic wave fluctuations (also known as vacuum fluctuations or virtual particles). From which it is postulated that all matter is manifested from.

Zero point energy is the residual energy which prevails throughout all space (and even what was thought to be empty space). In laboratories upon removing gas & temperature from an isolated system (which effectively emulates the deepest darkest regions of space) - it is revealed that energy is still evident. That is what is called Zero point energy.

So the difference is that quantum foam is the manifestation of matter (infinite bubbles of patterns which can materialize into complex structures) while ZPE is the energy source; the flow of energy; the infinite sea of energy from which the foam flows.

Their relationship makes up the fabric of our universe.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top