Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the quantum harmonic oscillator, specifically focusing on determining the value of a constant in a wave function and its corresponding energy eigenvalue. The original poster attempts to substitute a proposed wave function into the energy eigenvalue equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of a quadratic equation derived from substituting the wave function into the energy eigenvalue equation. Questions arise regarding the necessity for certain terms to cancel out and the reasoning behind it.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring the conditions under which terms in the equation must equal zero. Some guidance has been provided regarding the cancellation of terms, and there is a shared understanding developing around the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the relationship between the wave function and the energy eigenstates, with participants noting the significance of the x-dependence in the context of the problem.

Crush1986
Messages
205
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


Substitute \psi = Ne^{-ax^2} into the position-space energy eigenvalue equation and determine the value of the constant a that makes this function an eigenfunction. What is the corresponding energy eigenvalue?

Homework Equations


\frac{-\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} \langle x | E \rangle + \frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 x^2 \langle x| E \rangle = E \langle x | E \rangle

The Attempt at a Solution



So, initially I tried to solve for a by plugging in \psi but I got a nasty quadratic \frac{2 \hbar^2 x^2}{m} a^2 - \frac{\hbar^2}{m} a + \left( E - \frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 x^2 \right) = 0that didn't really seem right. I then did some research and found a similar problem where the book stopped at a similar quadratic equation (the problem was for the first excited state) and said that "the x^2 terms must cancel.

Why is that? I guess I haven't seen the energy eigenstates depend on x before... So I suppose that gives reason to believe that the terms with x will negate each other?

Following that recipe I arrived at the same value of a as they do a = \frac{m \omega}{2 \hbar} and I also arrive at the expected energy (Since this given psi is of the form of the ground state harmonic oscillator) E = \frac{\hbar \omega}{2}.

Thanks for any help with understanding this deeper.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Crush1986 said:
Why is that?
Because that quadratic equation must hold for any value of ##x##.
 
Ok! I think I see. the rest of the terms are constant, so if x varies the zero on the right must still obviously be a 0. Only way this happens is if the two x^2 terms are equal, right?
 
Yes.
 
Thank you so much! That is kind of a subtle thing to notice! Makes total sense now though, thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K