Quantum harmonics oscillator at high temperature

alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Hello

The energy of harmonics oscillator, started of U=-\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} \ln Z is equal to \frac{\hbar \omega}{2} + \frac{\hbar \omega}{exp(\beta \hbar \omega)-1}.

At high temperature, i could say that exp (\beta \hbar \omega ) \approx 1 + (\beta \hbar \omega ), and then U=\frac{\hbar \omega}{2} + kT, therefore at high temperature \frac{\hbar \omega}{2} is negligible compared to kT, and then U \approx k T.

I need find arguments about why is incorrect say that \frac{\hbar \omega}{2} + \frac{\hbar \omega}{exp(\beta \hbar \omega)-1} at \beta \to 0 (high temperature) is equal to \infty. This motivated by the fact that k T = k \cdot \infty = \infty. I understand that at high temperature the energy has a asyntote equal to kT (http://www.av8n.com/physics/oscillator.htm#sec-e-vs-t ), but still need argumens.

Also ¿why the harmonics oscillators need a specific heat at high temperature?. In this case the specific heat is equal to k. But if the energy us infinity, then the specific heat would be zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alejandrito29 said:
I need find arguments about why is incorrect say that \frac{\hbar \omega}{2} + \frac{\hbar \omega}{exp(\beta \hbar \omega)-1} at \beta \to 0 (high temperature) is equal to \infty.

The precise statement would be that ##\frac{\hbar \omega}{2} + \frac{\hbar \omega}{exp(\beta \hbar \omega)-1} \to \infty## as ##\beta \to 0##. We always have to speak of limits when discussing infinity. Nothing ever equals infinity.

alejandrito29 said:
Also ¿why the harmonics oscillators need a specific heat at high temperature?. In this case the specific heat is equal to k. But if the energy us infinity, then the specific heat would be zero.

The energy is never infinity. For any finite temperature, no matter how large, the energy is finite. So you can always evaluate the specific heat ##d U / d T## and it is always nonzero, for any ##T > 0##.
 
The_Duck said:
The energy is never infinity. For any finite temperature, no matter how large, the energy is finite. So you can always evaluate the specific heat ##d U / d T## and it is always nonzero, for any ##T > 0##.

¿why The energy is never infinity?

The_Duck said:
For any finite temperature, no matter how large, the energy is finite.

but the literature says that at T \to \infty , then U \to k T

sorry, but still i don´t understand
 
alejandrito29 said:
¿why The energy is never infinity?

Because nothign is ever infinite. This is why we have to talk about limits. This is as true here as in in every other case in math and physics.

but the literature says that at T \to \infty , then U \to k T

Which is correct, but does not mean that T ever EQUALS infinity.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top