Quantum Mechanics: a non-normalizable state

jalobo
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At a given moment, the wave function of a particle is in a non-normalizable state \Psi(x) = 1 + sin²(kx). By measuring its kinetic energy, what values are possible and with what probability?.


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I can't calculate the probability because the integral that define it is unbounded.
(\Psi, \widehat{K}\Psi) = \infty
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can express that state as a sum of states with definite momentum and hence definite energy. What are their relative amplitudes? Hint,
sin(kx)=(exp(ikx)-exp(-ikx))/2i.
 
Thanks Dick for your hint.

Here is what I did following your advice:

\Psi(x) = exp{i(2k)x} - \frac{1}{4}exp{i(-2k)x} + (1+i)exp{i(0)x},

that is, I have expressed the wave function as a linear combination of self-states of the linear momentum.

So, we have:

\left\|\Psi\right\|² = 1 + \frac{1}{16}+2 \Rightarrow\left\|\Psi\right\| = \frac{7}{4}

and, using the same notation, the normalized wave function is

\Psi(x) = \frac{4}{7} exp{i(2k)x} - \frac{1}{7} exp{i(-2k)x} + \left(\frac{4}{7} + \frac{4}{7} i \right) exp{i(0)x}.

Hence,


Pr(p_{x} = 2k) = \frac{16}{49},

Pr(p_{x} = -2k) = \frac{1}{49},

Pr(p_{x} = 0) = \frac{32}{49},

and therefore, denoting the kinetic energy by T, we finally have:

Pr(T = 2k²/2m) = \frac{17}{49},

Pr(T = 0) = \frac{32}{49},

as the kinetic energy is related to linear momentum through the expression

T = \frac{p^{2}_{x}}{2m}.

Is it right?.
 
Something went wrong with the very first line. I don't see how e^(2ikx) and e^(-2ikx) can have different coefficients. Did you miss a bracket in
sin(kx)=[exp(ikx)-exp(-ikx)]/(2i)? Your general approach is right, though.
 
Oh, yes, I missed a bracket in sin(kx)=[exp(ikx)-exp(-ikx)]/(2i). Thank you very much.

Let's see if now is entirely correct.

Taking into account the identity sin(kx) = \frac{exp(ikx)-exp(-ikx)}{2i},

the non-normalizable wave function \Psi (x) = 1 + sin²(x) can be expressed as a linear combination of self-states of the linear momentum,

\Psi (x) = \frac{3}{2} exp{i(0)x} - \frac{1}{4} exp{i(2k)x} - \frac{1}{4} exp{i(-2k)x},

So, we have:

\left\|\Psi\right\|² = \frac{19}{8}\Rightarrow\left\|\Psi\right\| = \frac{\sqrt{38}}{4}

and the normalized wave function, using the same notation, is

\Psi(x) = \frac{6}{\sqrt{38}} exp{i(0k)x} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{38}} exp{i(2k)x} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{38}} exp{i(-2k)x}

Thus, by measuring the observable linear momentum, the only possible values are those relating to these three self-states of the linear momentum, because in the process of measuring the wave function is projected onto one of these (collapse or reduction of the state), and the probabilities for each value of the linear momentum is given by the square of the amplitude of the corresponding self-functions.

Hence,

Pr(p_{x} = 0) = \frac{36}{38},

Pr(p_{x} = 2k) = \frac{1}{38},

Pr(p_{x} = -2k) = \frac{1}{38},

and therefore, denoting the kinetic energy by T, we finally have:

Pr(T = 0) = \frac{18}{19},

Pr(T = 2k²/m) = \frac{1}{19},

as the kinetic energy is related to linear momentum through the expression

T = \frac{p^{2}_{x}}{2m}.

Thanks in advance.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top