Quantum Mechanics by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the book "Quantum Mechanics" by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu, and Frank Laloe. Participants share their experiences and opinions regarding the book's structure, content, and utility in learning quantum mechanics, touching on aspects of theory and educational application.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants find the appendices at the end of each chapter to be useful for covering extra topics, while others feel that they complicate the learning process.
  • One participant notes that the book is a classic and highlights their experience with the 1977 English translation, mentioning its original French publication in 1973.
  • Another participant expresses a preference for the organization of Albert Messiah's two-volume text over Cohen-Tannoudji's, citing difficulties with the extensive appendices.
  • A participant mentions that the book was used in their first quantum course and contributed to their understanding, despite its challenging nature and the need to navigate between sections and appendices.
  • Concerns are raised about the book's high cost, which some participants find to be a drawback.
  • One participant appreciates the book's rigor but criticizes the short chapters and the placement of supplementary material in the appendices rather than the main text.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions regarding the book's structure and effectiveness as a learning tool. While some appreciate the appendices and rigor, others find them cumbersome and prefer alternative texts. No consensus is reached on the overall value of the book.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention challenges with the book's organization and the necessity of cross-referencing sections, indicating potential limitations in the text's pedagogical approach. The discussion does not resolve these concerns.

For those who have used this book


  • Total voters
    8
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
16,213
Reaction score
2,877
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This book is interesting. Each chapter has its own 'appendices' where a bunch of extra topics are covered. I think the book series is really useful for those extra sections at the end of each chapter. The main chapter content I found difficult to learn from initially.
 
Jorriss said:
This book is interesting. Each chapter has its own 'appendices' where a bunch of extra topics are covered. I think the book series is really useful for those extra sections at the end of each chapter. The main chapter content I found difficult to learn from initially.
The book is a classic. I have the 1977 English translation edition, which was brand new at the time. The book first appeared in French in 1973.
 
Though great as a reference book on many topics, the way these French people organized the text with kilometric, multiple appendices for each chapter is hard to understand. My reccomandation when it comes to long, encyclopedic type of books on QM is to rather own a copy of the 2 volume text by Albert Messiah, than of Claude Cohen-Tannoudji.
 
My first quantum course used this book, and it is what most people use in my country. After that quantum 2 was a total breeze. It is hard though, and I did have to jump back and forth between sections/appendices to learn the basics, but I probably wouldn't be as skilled in qm if I had studied it from a less rigorous text.

Ridiculously expensive though.
 
I used it in graduate school, good book, but I am not a fan of the short chapters and a load of appendices after each chapter to introduce items that should be part of the main text.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K