Quantum Mechanics Equation Question

AI Thread Summary
The equation in question is incorrectly labeled as an equation but is actually an operator equality. It relates to the Laplacian in two dimensions with azimuthal symmetry. The discussion suggests a connection to the three-dimensional wave equation, indicating its relevance in partial differential equations (PDE). The clarification highlights the importance of accurate classification in quantum mechanics equations. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for proper application in physics.
atomicpedals
Messages
202
Reaction score
7
I'm typing up my notes and I came across the attached equation and it seems I didn't write anything else about it; so, does it have a name or special classification?
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2011-08-09 at 6.24.16 AM.png
    Screen shot 2011-08-09 at 6.24.16 AM.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 459
Physics news on Phys.org
It's no equation, it's an equality written incorrectly, because

\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2} r = 0
 
But it's fine as an operator equality
\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial^2r\psi}{\partial r^2}=\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial r^2}+\frac{2}{r}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r}
 
Last edited:
If I remember correctly, this is the Laplacian in 2D, with azimuthal symmetry.

Edit: No, I'm wrong. Perhaps it has something to do with the 3D wave equation. I definitely saw this in a PDE course.
 
Last edited:
Operator equality and 3D wave equation both definitely fit with where it is in my notes!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top