Quantum mechanics for wave equation solution

bfed
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

consider the differential d²ψ(x)/dx²=k²ψ(x); for which values of a is the equation e^(a*x) is a solution to the above equation.

2. Homework Equations



3. The Attempt at a Solution
I have been working on this problem but I do not know how relate the 2 equations, or if I should use the Schrodinger equation. Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi bfed ! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
bfed said:
consider the differential d²ψ(x)/dx²=k²ψ(x); for which values of a is the equation e^(a*x) is a solution to the above equation..

Just put ψ(x) = eax into d²ψ(x)/dx²=k²ψ(x), and solve for a. :wink:
 
thanks tiny-tim,
so i should take the second derivative of ψ(x) = eax before I substitute it into d²ψ(x)/dx²=k²ψ(x) and solve for a?
 
bfed said:
thanks tiny-tim,
so i should take the second derivative of ψ(x) = eax before I substitute it into d²ψ(x)/dx²=k²ψ(x) and solve for a?

uhhh? :confused:

just put it in! :smile:
 
I think your confusion may come from from the idea of solutions to differential equations.
A solution is anything that we can put into this equation where after taking the derivatives and everything, the two sides equal each other. i.e. we are testing to see if our proposed solution of \Psi(x) is valid. A good example to show would be one where the proposed solution was not valid. let's consider the proposed solution:

\Psi(x) = x^2

Now if we plug this into our differential equation we obtain:


2 = k^2 x^2

If k is a constant this is obviously not always true(example x=0). Therefore our proposed solution is not valid. In reality we want to find solutions that are valid. Let's propose a solution:


\Psi(x) = e^{ax}

Now you go as I did in the invalid case, and plug \Psi(x) into our differential equation. You will find that 'a' must equal something for the solution to be valid.
 
thanks all, got'er done with your help!
-bfed
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top