Quantum Mechanics: Shankar vs Sakurai

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qubix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shankar
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion compares two prominent quantum mechanics textbooks: "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" by R. Shankar and "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by J. J. Sakurai. Shankar's book is praised for its operational understanding and accessibility, making it suitable for learners who prefer a more verbose and explanatory style. In contrast, Sakurai's text is noted for its depth and formal approach, which may appeal to those seeking a rigorous treatment of the subject. Ultimately, both books are valuable, and the choice depends on the reader's comfort level and learning preferences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic quantum mechanics concepts
  • Familiarity with mathematical formalism in physics
  • Knowledge of linear algebra and differential equations
  • Experience with problem-solving in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced topics in quantum mechanics using Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics"
  • Study supplementary materials on quantum mechanics problem-solving techniques
  • Review mathematical foundations relevant to quantum mechanics, such as linear algebra
  • Engage with online forums or study groups focused on quantum mechanics discussions
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching quantum mechanics, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of quantum theory through established textbooks.

Qubix
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
I've started to learn Quantum Mechanics from Shankar's book "Principles of Quantum Mechanics". My qm professor recommended Sakurai to me, but I feel more comfortable using Shankar. What can you tell me about these 2 books? Which one do you prefer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shankar is a great book. It is certainly sufficient to develop an operational understanding of quantum mechanics, and if you understand the material in it you'll be plenty ready to apply QM. Sakurai is a bit deeper, but also less verbose and a bit more formal. It's a good book to read, but if you're more comfortable with Shankar, then there's no reason to drop it for Sakurai.
 

Similar threads

Quantum Quantum Mechanics Textbooks: Alternatives to Sakurai
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Classical A relearning experience - self study edition
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Quantum Math Textbooks to Read Before Starting QFT
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Quantum Quantum Mechanics Textbook，Zettili vs Shankar
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
Quantum Better advanced Quantum Mechanics book than Sakurai?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Quantum Where to Go Next: Quantum Mechanics Textbooks Beyond Shankar?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Book recommendation after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
840
Relativity Studying Modern Physics, need book recommendations
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Quantum What Are the Best Books Linking Scattering Theory to Experiments?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Quantum Modern Quantum Mechanics 3rd Ed: J. J. Sakurai & Jim Napolitano Review
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K