Quantum Mechanics: Shankar vs Sakurai

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qubix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shankar
AI Thread Summary
Shankar's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" is praised for its clarity and operational approach, making it suitable for developing a solid understanding of quantum mechanics. Readers find it accessible and sufficient for practical application of QM concepts. In contrast, Sakurai's text is noted for its depth and formality, offering a more rigorous treatment of the subject. While Sakurai is recommended for those seeking a deeper dive, it is emphasized that if Shankar aligns better with a reader's comfort level, there is no need to switch to Sakurai. Both books have their merits, but personal preference and comprehension are key factors in choosing between them.
Qubix
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
I've started to learn Quantum Mechanics from Shankar's book "Principles of Quantum Mechanics". My qm professor recommended Sakurai to me, but I feel more comfortable using Shankar. What can you tell me about these 2 books? Which one do you prefer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shankar is a great book. It is certainly sufficient to develop an operational understanding of quantum mechanics, and if you understand the material in it you'll be plenty ready to apply QM. Sakurai is a bit deeper, but also less verbose and a bit more formal. It's a good book to read, but if you're more comfortable with Shankar, then there's no reason to drop it for Sakurai.
 

Thread '"WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians'

The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
View full post »

Thread 'Books with a more theoretical approach to turbulence and DNS'

I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
View full post »

Similar threads

Quantum Quantum Mechanics Textbooks: Alternatives to Sakurai
Replies
1
Views
2K
Classical A relearning experience - self study edition
Replies
16
Views
5K
Quantum Math Textbooks to Read Before Starting QFT
Replies
9
Views
4K
Quantum Quantum Mechanics Textbook，Zettili vs Shankar
Replies
5
Views
8K
Quantum Better advanced Quantum Mechanics book than Sakurai?
Replies
1
Views
3K
Quantum Where to Go Next: Quantum Mechanics Textbooks Beyond Shankar?
Replies
11
Views
3K
Book recommendation after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
172
Relativity Studying Modern Physics, need book recommendations
Replies
2
Views
5K
Quantum What Are the Best Books Linking Scattering Theory to Experiments?
Replies
1
Views
3K
Quantum Modern Quantum Mechanics 3rd Ed: J. J. Sakurai & Jim Napolitano Review
Replies
10
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top