Quantum Mechanics, time independant solution in Dirac notati

Ben Whelan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the Hamiltonian:
$$\hat{H}=C*(\vec{B} \cdot \vec{S})$$
where $C$ is a constant and the magnetic field is given by

$$\vec{B} = (0,B,0) $$

and the spin is

$$\vec{S} = (\hat{S}_{x},\hat{S}_{y},\hat{S}_{z}),$$

with$$\hat{S}_{x} =\frac{\hbar}{2}∣↑⟩⟨↓∣+ \frac{\hbar}{2}∣↓⟩⟨↑∣ $$$$\hat{S}_{y} =−\frac{i\hbar}{2}∣↑⟩⟨↓∣+ \frac{i\hbar}{2}∣↓⟩⟨↑∣ $$$$\hat{S}_{z} =\frac{\hbar}{2}∣↑⟩⟨↑∣− \frac{\hbar}{2}∣↓⟩⟨↓∣,$$

where the basis vectors are assumed orthogonal and normalised. Knowing that at t=0

$$ ∣ψ(0)⟩= \frac{1}{2}∣ψ_1⟩+ \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}∣ψ_2⟩$$

where the ${∣ψ_i⟩}$ are the eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian, solve the time-dependent Schrodinger equation. Write the solution in terms of the basis vectors $∣↑⟩$ and $∣↓⟩$.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


From the question I understand that the Hamiltonian will cancel out the x and z spin operators through the dot product. I have tried following this forward and using a presumed general solution to the time dependent Schrodinger equation but I got no where. Could someone just explain to me how to look at attempting this question?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would start by calculating the eigenstates of ##\hat{H}##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top