Quantum Mechanics - Two spin 1/2 particles

Tangent87
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
How do we show that the state |\chi>=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\uparrow>|\downarrow>-|\downarrow>|\uparrow>) has total spin zero? Does it involve acting some combination of the spin operators on it?

I know that the total spin operator \underline{S^2}=S_x^2+S_y^2+S_z^2=\frac{3\hbar^2}{4}I where I is the 2x2 identity matrix but I don't see how that helps.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For two particles you should use

S_{12}=S_1\otimes S_2

For each spin component. So, for S_z it will be easy. For S^2_x+S^2_y you play with S_x+iS_y[/tex] and its conjugate, their commutations with S_z, or you can play with the explicit form of states and matrices.
 
Act on it with the operator:

<br /> \hat{S}^{2} = \hat{S}^{2}_{1} + \hat{S}^{2}_{2} + 2 (\hat{\mathbf{S}}_{1} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{S}}_{2})<br />

and express the dot product with the ladder operators:

<br /> (\hat{\mathbf{S}}_{1} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{S}}_{2}) = \hat{S}_{1 x} \hat{S}_{2 x} + \hat{S}_{1 y} \hat{S}_{2 y} + \hat{S}_{1 z} \hat{S}_{2 z}<br />
<br /> = \frac{1}{4} \left[\left(\hat{S}_{1 +} + \hat{S}_{1 -}\right) \left(\hat{S}_{2 +} + \hat{S}_{2 -}\right) - \left(\hat{S}_{1 +} - \hat{S}_{1 -}\right) \left(\hat{S}_{2 +} - \hat{S}_{2 -}\right)\right] + \hat{S}_{1 z} \hat{S}_{2 z}<br />
<br /> = \frac{1}{2} \left(\hat{S}_{1 +} \hat{S}_{2 -} + \hat{S}_{1 -} \hat{S}_{2 +}\right) + \hat{S}_{1 z} \hat{S}_{2 z}<br />

You should get:

<br /> \hat{S}^{2} |\chi\rangle = S (S + 1) |\chi\rangle<br />

What value for S do you get?
 
Thank you for your help, I get \hat{S}^{2} |\chi\rangle = 0, I take it that's correct as it's supposed to be a state of total spin 0? Is there no easier way to do it though as it took quite a bit of work and I see the result stated in so many textbooks as if it's obvious?
 
There is, through the use of Young tableaux.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top