Quantum Paradox: Interfering Imaginary Slits?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the quantum mechanics concept of interference using imaginary slits in the double-slit experiment. It posits that probability amplitudes for indistinguishable paths, represented as and , can interfere even when slits are imaginary. The conversation further explores the implications of introducing an imaginary point between the source and the screen, leading to two classes of paths that also interfere. The conclusion emphasizes that indistinguishable final states maintain interference properties regardless of the physical reality of the slits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly the double-slit experiment.
  • Familiarity with probability amplitudes and their role in quantum interference.
  • Knowledge of the concept of indistinguishable states in quantum physics.
  • Basic grasp of mathematical notation used in quantum mechanics, such as bra-ket notation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of imaginary numbers in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the mathematical framework of quantum probability amplitudes.
  • Explore the concept of indistinguishable particles and their effects on quantum interference.
  • Learn about advanced topics in quantum mechanics, such as path integrals and their applications.
USEFUL FOR

Students and enthusiasts of quantum mechanics, physicists exploring advanced quantum theories, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum interference.

dx
Homework Helper
Messages
2,143
Reaction score
52
Hi, I'm just beginning to learn about the quantum world, so excuse me if this is naive.

Consider the double-slit experiment except that the slits are imaginary. call the slits A and B.

you have a probability amplitude that a particles goes to the point x on the screen via A (an imaginary slit) and also an amplitude that it goes to the screen via B :

< xA | s >
< xB | s >

these two amplitudes are clearly the amplitudes for indistinguishable final states and therefore should interfere. but since the slits are imaginary, you could also write it as a single amplitude <x|s> and the probability is then just |<x|a>|^2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you could object that I am not considering all possible paths to the screen, so let me modify it a little.

instead of two imaginary slits, say we have an imaginary point between the screen and the source. then there are two possible classes of paths to the screen : the amplitude for the paths that go above the point and the ones that go below the point. the final states by the two types of paths are indistinguishable and so the amplitudes interfere with each other.
 
What's the problem? Everything is fine if one uses the amplitude
&lt;x|A|s&gt;+&lt;x|B|s&gt;+... for n paths
which becomes
n&lt;x|A|s&gt;
when n paths are 'indistinguishable'.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K