Quantum physics-related literature

JamesCC
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm sorry if this has been asked ad infinitum.

I'm interested in quantum physics but have little academic experience in science or classical physics. I'm curious as to what some of you would suggest as optimal, or even essential, requisites as far as quantum physics-related literature goes. How much of a background in classical physics should I aspire towards?

All suggestions/help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF JamesCC!

The key to understanding physics is advanced http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_topics_in_mathematics".

I’m a layman myself, and have the same "problems"... :wink:

But, why buy expensive literature when you can have your own personal professor, teaching you everything for free!? :rolleyes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Susskind", professor of Theoretical Physics at Stanford University, have a several free lectures on YouTube. The lectures are assembled in courses of 8 to 12 lectures of 1½ to 2 hours. Below are the links to the playlists of the full courses on YouTube (plays next lecture automatically). This will give you a total of 57 lectures, summing up to approx 100 hours of skilled education:


As for literature, I’m probably going to buy https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521869633/?tag=pfamazon01-20 by Gennaro Auletta, Mauro Fortunato and Giorgio Parisi (2009):
412vwR0ztYL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg

It starts with a short review of the foundations of classical mechanics, and then gives details on all topics of QM. It have tables of all QM abbreviations and (those hieroglyphic! :smile:) symbols, which I see as a big plus. It may well be used as a reference book, with rapid access to specific topics.

Good luck!


Edit: Here is a http://www.ewidgetsonline.com/dxrea...catalogue/AddToBasket.asp?isbn=9780521869638" on the book (page 1 - 53) + very neat content index. It looks very promising...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
8K
Replies
115
Views
12K
Back
Top