Quantum Probability: Sets & Complex Numbers

closet mathemetician
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Classically, probability can be described using axiomatic set theory, where probabilities are related to the cardinality (size) of the sets involved.

For a quantum probability, the probability of a particular state is the squared magnitude of the wave function (eigenfunction) for that state's eigenvalue.

Relating this back to sets, what sort of a set has a complex number representing its cardinality? Or, more specifically, how can a complex number represent the "size" of a set?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
closet mathemetician said:
...how can a complex number represent the "size" of a set?

And a couple of real numbers, can they?
 
Classically, probability can be described using axiomatic set theory, where probabilities are related to the cardinality (size) of the sets involved.
Probability axiomatics uses set theory (sigma algebras and all that), but cardinality has nothing to do with it. The axioms for probability resemble those for measure theory, plus the addition that the probability (measure) of the entire space is one.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top