in Equation 15.5.6 and expanding to see what you get? It looks like you should get the result they obtain if you work at it using that relation.
#3
jhon
21
0
the second eq II ?? it's equale zero why??
#4
jdwood983
382
0
If you have expanded Equation 15.5.6 using the substitution given, try separating the resulting equation into the real and imaginary components. It looks to me like Equation I in 15.5.7 is the imaginary part and Equation II of 15.5.7 is the real part after substituting for \sin[x].
I don't think that the two parts of 15.5.7 are the real and imaginary parts of 15.5.6, but rather they result from the fact that e^{ikr} and e^{-ikr} are orthogonal functions of r, and hence the relation \alpha e^{ikr}+\beta e^{-ikr}=0[/itex] can only be true for all r if \alpha=\beta=0.
Hi,
I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem.
Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$
Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane.
We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$
Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units,
According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##,
## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units.
So is this conversion correct?
Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?