A Quantum synchronization description used in a paper

Danny Boy
Messages
48
Reaction score
3
In the paper "Steady-state spin synchronization through the collective motion of trapped ions" it states the following:

"Steady-state synchronization of atomic dipoles forms the foundation for ultra-stable optical lasers utilizing
narrow-linewidth atoms coupled to a lossy cavity mode. The cavity mode acts as a channel for synchronization of the atomic dipoles (spins) resulting in a macroscopic collective dipole in steady-state composed of correlated atoms. Synchronization here refers to the development of a preferred relative phase (correlations) between every pair of spins. "

Question:
Does anyone know how the statement in bold could be expressed mathematically (to add some clarity)?

Thanks for any assistance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Answer: The statement in bold can be expressed mathematically as: Let ϕ_i and ϕ_j be the relative phases between spins i and j, then the steady-state synchronization of atomic dipoles is given by the correlationC_{ij} = E[cos(ϕ_i - φ_j)]
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
18K
Back
Top