Quantum - Two State Problem in different bases

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a two-state quantum system's Hamiltonian and operator A in different bases. The Hamiltonian matrix is established in the |1⟩, |2⟩ basis, leading to eigenvalues and eigenvectors that are calculated correctly. However, the user struggles with part c, particularly in expressing the prepared state in terms of the eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian. Clarifications are provided regarding normalization of eigenvectors and the correct identification of states corresponding to eigenvalues of A. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the importance of proper normalization in quantum mechanics.
leo_africanus
Messages
4
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


[/B]
(Working through a problem from a practice set for which I have a solution available, but still don't understand. I get the same answer as they do for part a, but get lost in part b, I think. Relevant portions below)

Consider a two-state quantum system. In the orthonormal and complete set of basis vectors ##\langle 1 |## and ##\langle 2 |##, the Hamiltonian operator for the system is represented by (ω > 0):
$$H = 10 \hbar \omega |1⟩⟨1| - 3 \hbar \omega |1⟩⟨2| - 3 \hbar \omega |2⟩⟨1| + 2 \hbar \omega |2⟩⟨2|$$
Consider another complete and orthonormal basis |α⟩, |β⟩, such that ##H|α⟩ = E_1|α⟩##, and ##H|β⟩ = E_2|β⟩## (with ##E_1 < E_2##). Let the action of operator A on the |α⟩, |β⟩ basis vectors be given as:
$$ A|α⟩ = 2ia_0|β⟩ $$
$$ A|β⟩ = -2ia_0|α⟩ - 3a_0|β⟩$$
where ##a_0 > 0## is real.

a) Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of H in the |1⟩, |2⟩ basis.

b) Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A in the |α⟩, |β⟩ basis.

c) Suppose a measurement of A is carried out at t=0 on an arbitrary state and the largest possible value is obtained. Calculate the probability P(t) that another measurement made at time t will yield the value as the one measured at t=0.

Homework Equations


Eigenvalue equation: ##|X-\lambda I | = 0##

Orthonormality: ##⟨x|y⟩=\delta(x-y)##

Probability: ##P(t) = |⟨\psi_0|\psi(t)⟩|^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
My disagreement with the available solution comes when writing the prepared state for part c in terms of the eigenvectors for the energy.

a) From the equation for H we can write out the matrix for H in the |1⟩, |2⟩ basis as:
$$ H = \begin{bmatrix}
10ℏω & -3ℏω\\
3ℏω & 2ℏω
\end{bmatrix} $$

Then ##|H-\lambda I | = 0## gives eigenvalues of ##\lambda_1 = ℏω = E_1## and ##\lambda_2 = 11ℏω = E_2##,
with corresponding normalized eigenvectors:
$$|\lambda_1⟩ = |α⟩ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{10}} \begin{bmatrix} 1\\3 \end{bmatrix}$$
$$|\lambda_2⟩ = |β⟩ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{10}} \begin{bmatrix} 3\\-1 \end{bmatrix}$$

b) To get the matrix for A in the |α⟩, |β⟩ basis I use the given action of A on the basis vectors and their orthogonality:

$$ A = \begin{bmatrix} ⟨α|A|α⟩ & ⟨α|A|β⟩\\ ⟨β|A|α⟩ & ⟨β|A|β⟩ \end{bmatrix} =
\begin{bmatrix} 2ia_0⟨α|β⟩ & -2ia_0⟨α|α⟩-3a_0⟨α|β⟩\\ 2ia_0⟨β|β⟩ & -2ia_0⟨β|α⟩-3a_0⟨β|β⟩ \end{bmatrix} =
\begin{bmatrix} 0 & -2ia_0\\ 2ia_0 & -3a_0 \end{bmatrix}$$

Then ##|A-\lambda I | = 0## gives eigenvalues of ##\lambda_1 = a_0## and ##\lambda_2 = -4a_0 ##,
with corresponding normalized eigenvectors:
$$|\lambda_1⟩ = \frac{-1}{\sqrt{3}} \begin{bmatrix} 2\\i \end{bmatrix}$$
$$|\lambda_2⟩ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \begin{bmatrix} i\\2 \end{bmatrix}$$

c) The largest possible value of A that could be measured is ##a_0##, which prepares the system in state ##|\psi_0⟩ = |a_0⟩##

To get the time dependence for the wave function, I need to express |a_0⟩ in terms of the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. The way I thought this would be done is simply by writing |a_0⟩ as a linear combination of |α⟩, |β⟩ basis vectors as follows (using the vectors found in part a):
$$x|α⟩ + y|β⟩ = |a_0⟩$$
Giving a system of two linear equations,
$$\frac{x}{\sqrt{10}} + \frac{3y}{\sqrt{10}} = \frac{-2}{\sqrt{3}} $$
$$\frac{3x}{\sqrt{10}} - \frac{y}{\sqrt{10}} = \frac{-i}{\sqrt{3}} $$

Solving for x and y gives me: ##x=-\frac{3i+2}{\sqrt{30}}## and ##y=\frac{i-6}{\sqrt{30}}## for:
$$|a_0⟩ = -\frac{3i+2}{\sqrt{30}}|α⟩ + \frac{i-6}{\sqrt{30}}|β⟩$$

The solution for the problem that I have is consistent until this point, where it gives (without showing any work):
$$|a_0⟩ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}|α⟩ - \frac{2i}{\sqrt{5}}|β⟩$$

Any help with where I've gone wrong here would be much appreciated!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
leo_africanus said:
Then ##|A-\lambda I | = 0## gives eigenvalues of ##\lambda_1 = a_0## and ##\lambda_2 = -4a_0 ##,
with corresponding normalized eigenvectors:
$$|\lambda_1⟩ = \frac{-1}{\sqrt{3}} \begin{bmatrix} 2\\i \end{bmatrix}$$
$$|\lambda_2⟩ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \begin{bmatrix} i\\2 \end{bmatrix}$$
Your vectors are not normalized. The ##\sqrt 3## is not correct.

Note that what you are getting here is ##|\lambda_1⟩## and ##|\lambda_2⟩## expressed in the energy-eigenstate basis ##\{ |α⟩, |β⟩ \}##. So, you immediately have the expansion of ##|\lambda_1⟩##, say, in terms of ##|α⟩## and ##|β⟩## without further work.

Their answer ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}|α⟩ - \frac{2i}{\sqrt{5}}|β⟩## appears to correspond to the eigenstate of ##A## with eigenvalue ##-4a_0## rather than corresponding to the state with eigenvalue ##a_0##.
 
TSny said:
Your vectors are not normalized. The ##\sqrt 3## is not correct.

Note that what you are getting here is ##|\lambda_1⟩## and ##|\lambda_2⟩## expressed in the energy-eigenstate basis ##\{ |α⟩, |β⟩ \}##. So, you immediately have the expansion of ##|\lambda_1⟩##, say, in terms of ##|α⟩## and ##|β⟩## without further work.

Their answer ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}|α⟩ - \frac{2i}{\sqrt{5}}|β⟩## appears to correspond to the eigenstate of ##A## with eigenvalue ##-4a_0## rather than corresponding to the state with eigenvalue ##a_0##.

Got it, thanks so much for the clarification!

Normalization should be (where ##λ_{1,i}## is the ##i^{th}## component of ##|\lambda_1⟩ ##):
$$ || λ_1 || = \sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^N λ_{1,i} λ_{1,i}^*} = \sqrt{5}$$ (and likewise for ##|\lambda_2⟩##)

Thanks again!
 
OK. Good work!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top