I Quasi-Distribution for Non-Physicists

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter consuli
  • Start date Start date
consuli
Messages
62
Reaction score
4
Hello!

I am a statistician interested in physics.

In the glm procedure in the software R, one can choose, quasi-distribution. I have always wondered what that might be.

Could you introduce the statistical nature of quasi-distribution to me, ideally without mentioning any physics terms like Schrödinger-equation and so on.

Quasi-distribution has a proper statistical defintion, doesn't it? So for the first: The density of quasi-distribution references the probability of what?

Consuli
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I am looking for a more intuitive and especially less physical but more statistical introduction to this topic.

I am trying"The Wigner Transform", De Gosson, Maurice A, 2017 now. I guess, this isn't easier, but at least more detailed.

Consuli
 
consuli said:
In the glm procedure in the software R, one can choose, quasi-distribution. I have always wondered what that might be.
The R documentation I see online uses the term "quasilikelihood", not "quasidistribution". https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/stats/versions/3.4.3/topics/glm

A "Quasi-likelihood" may be an entirely different thing than a quasiprobability distribution. (The current Wikipedia treats them in different articles.)

Attempting to develop an intuition about either concept would be an interesting project.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
The R documentation I see online uses the term "quasilikelihood", not "quasidistribution". https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/stats/versions/3.4.3/topics/glm A "Quasi-likelihood" may be an entirely different thing than a quasiprobability distribution. (The current Wikipedia treats them in different articles.)

Meanwhile I have figured out, that
Wigner Probability Distribution
and
Quasi Probability Distribution
are the same, thus both related to Schrödinger equation (and the ones I asked for)

but
Quasi-likelihood
is another very different thing (I did NOT asked for).

Consuli
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top