Quaternions and metric of the 3-sphere

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
let's supppose I am given a unit-quaternion q expressed as an element of \mathcal{C}\ell_{0,2}(\mathbb{R}) as follows:

\mathit{q} = a + b \mathbf{e_1} + c \mathbf{e_2} + d \mathbf{e_{12}}

I now rearrange the terms in the following way:

\mathit{q} = (a + d \mathbf{e_{12}}) + \mathbf{e_1}(b - c \mathbf{e_{12}})

The terms inside the brackets can be seen as ordinary complex numbers r_1e^{i\theta}[/itex] and r_2e^{i\phi}, so that <i>q</i> is an element of \mathbb{C}^2.<br /> <br /> Since <i>q</i> is a unit quaternion we must have that (r_1)^2 + (r_2)^2 = 1.<br /> Recalling that r_1and r_2[/tex] are non-negative, we can parametrize them with an auxiliary angle \psi \in [0,\pi / 2]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; r_1 = \cos\psi&lt;br /&gt; r_2 = \sin\psi&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; We have: \mathit{q} = \left( \cos\psi e^{i\theta}, \sin\psi e^{i\phi} \right)&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;b&gt;*** question: ***&lt;/b&gt; when i compute the metric on the 3-sphere I obtain the well-known form:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; ds^2 = d\psi^2 + \cos^2\psi d\theta^2 + \sin^2\psi d\phi^2.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; But now, \psi \in [0,\pi/2], and \theta,\phi \in [0,2\pi] which is not correct because other sources says that \psi is in the range [0,\pi].&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Where is the mistake?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ok...it doesn't matter.
Actually I think there might no mistake, in fact I've just noticed that Hopf coordinates are defined with the same ranges as I have used.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top