Qubit Spin Convention: |0> & |1> Eigenvectors?

lewis198
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
This is a bit embarrassing, but by convention does |0> = (1,0)^T and
|1>=(0,1)^T, where we are in the basis of the eigenvectors of \sigma_{z}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The notation is a bit misleading, since |0\rangle is most commonly used to denote the ground state of a system. However, in the absence of an external field, both spin states have the same energy. The justification for using the notation is the convention that in a communications protocol, one state must be chosen to signal binary 0 vs binary 1 for the other state. There's no particular reason to choose one over the other, but indeed the spin up state is conventionally chosen to be the off bit, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qubit#Physical_representation
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top