Qubit system, time dependent states.

The significance of "If the system is in state ##|z^+\rangle## at time ##t=0##" is that this is a given. It is an initial condition. It is the starting point for the system. You are interested in the time evolved state at time ##t##. The time evolved state at time ##t## is determined by the initial state and the time evolution operation, which is the Hamiltonian, ##H##. So, you are asked to find the probability of the time evolved state being in ##|z^-\rangle## given that the initial state is ##|z^+\rangle## and the time evolution operator is ##H##
  • #1
Lengalicious
163
0

Homework Statement



See attachment

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



(i) [tex]|\Psi(t)_{1}>=e^{{-itE_{1}/\hbar}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|z^{+}>+|z^{-}>)[/tex]
[tex]|\Psi(t)_{2}>=e^{{-itE_{2}/\hbar}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|z^{+}>-|z^{-}>)[/tex]

where [tex]E_{1}=\lambda\frac{\hbar^{2}}{4}+\mu\frac{\hbar}{2}[/tex]
[tex]E_{2}=\lambda\frac{\hbar^{2}}{4}-\mu\frac{\hbar}{2}[/tex]

(ii) [tex]|\Psi(t)>=\sum_{i}c_{i}(0)e^{{-itE_{i}/\hbar}}|\Psi_{i}>[/tex]

(iii) [tex]|<\psi(t)_{2}|\psi(0)_{1}>|^{2}=[/tex]
[tex]|(e^{it(\lambda\hbar^{2}/4-\mu\hbar/2)/\hbar}<z^{-}|)^{*}(|z^{+}>)|^{2}=0[/tex]

I feel like I'm doing something really wrong could someone check over my attempt please and guide me in the right direction if I'm doing it wrong.
 

Attachments

  • Q.png
    Q.png
    13.9 KB · Views: 386
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Lengalicious said:

The Attempt at a Solution



(i) [tex]|\Psi(t)_{1}>=e^{{-itE_{1}/\hbar}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|z^{+}>+|z^{-}>)[/tex]
[tex]|\Psi(t)_{2}>=e^{{-itE_{2}/\hbar}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|z^{+}>-|z^{-}>)[/tex]

where [tex]E_{1}=\lambda\frac{\hbar^{2}}{4}+\mu\frac{\hbar}{2}[/tex]
[tex]E_{2}=\lambda\frac{\hbar^{2}}{4}-\mu\frac{\hbar}{2}[/tex]

(ii) [tex]|\Psi(t)>=\sum_{i}c_{i}(0)e^{{-itE_{i}/\hbar}}|\Psi_{i}>[/tex]

Part (i) looks good. The stationary states are clearly ##|x^+\rangle## and ##|x^-\rangle## and these can be expressed in terms of ##|z^+\rangle## and ##|z^-\rangle## as you have done.

Some people would not include the time dependent exponential factors when writing the stationary states. The stationary states are often defined as solutions of the time independent Schrodinger equation, and so the stationary states are also time independent. The corresponding solutions to the full time dependent Schrodinger equation are then the stationary states multiplied by the exponential time dependent factors. Not a big deal in my opinion.

Part (ii) looks good. I would change the notation to [tex] |\Psi(t)>=\sum_{i}c_{i}\; e^{{-itE_{i}/\hbar}}|\Psi(0)_{i}>[/tex] This is the same as just writing ##|\Psi(t)\rangle = c_1 e^{{-itE_{1}/\hbar}}|x^+\rangle + c_2 e^{{-itE_{2}/\hbar}}|x^-\rangle##

You might want to write this out explicitly in terms of ##|z^+\rangle## and ##|z^-\rangle##.

(iii) [tex]|<\psi(t)_{2}|\psi(0)_{1}>|^{2}=[/tex]
[tex]|(e^{it(\lambda\hbar^{2}/4-\mu\hbar/2)/\hbar}<z^{-}|)^{*}(|z^{+}>)|^{2}=0[/tex]

This is not correct. You want "the probability that the state ##|\Psi(t) \rangle## at time ##t## is in the state ##|z^- \rangle##".

For practice, suppose you had a state that at time ##t## was given by ##|\phi(t)\rangle = .6|z^+\rangle + .8|z^-\rangle##.

What is the probability that ##|\phi(t)\rangle## is in the state ##|z^-\rangle##?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Thanks! In part iii) with your practice state the way you have worded it makes sense its just, [tex]|<\phi(t)|z^{-}>|^{2}[/tex]

however in the actual question part iii) even if i got it mixed up and it should be
[tex]|<\psi(t)|z^{-}>|^{2} [/tex]

[tex]<z^{+}|z^{-}>[/tex] is still going to be = 0, unless I'm still missing something here. From what you've said, I'm interpreting that all I have done is mix up which state is to be found inside of which, so I just need to switch the |Z>'s round.

Ultimately though the probability will still be equal to zero?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Can you write the state ##|\Psi(t)\rangle## as

##|\Psi(t)\rangle = a_1(t)|z^+\rangle + a_2(t)|z^-\rangle##

where ##a_1(t)## and ##a_2(t)## are certain time dependent coefficients?
 
  • #5
Yeh but if I'm measuring the probability of Z+ in Z- doesn't the state collapse?
 
  • #6
By any chance is this what your thinking of?
[tex]|\Psi(t)\rangle=e^{{-itE_{1}/\hbar}}|z^{+}\rangle+e^{{-itE_{2}/\hbar}}|z^{+}\rangle[/tex]

Like if I take the general state and then collapse it to [tex]|z^{+}\rangle[/tex] as this is what I am measuring the probability when the state is in [tex]|z^{-}\rangle[/tex], but then the z's still = 0
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Alternately, you can leave ##|\Psi(t)\rangle## expressed in terms of ##|x^+\rangle## and ##|x^-\rangle## with simple time dependent coefficients. And then construct the probability ##|\langle z^-|\Psi(t)\rangle|^2## which will involve evaluating ##\langle z^-|x^+\rangle## and ##\langle z^-|x^-\rangle##.
 
  • #8
TSny said:
Alternately, you can leave ##|\Psi(t)\rangle## expressed in terms of ##|x^+\rangle## and ##|x^-\rangle## with simple time dependent coefficients. And then construct the probability ##|\langle z^-|\Psi(t)\rangle|^2## which will involve evaluating ##\langle z^-|x^+\rangle## and ##\langle z^-|x^-\rangle##.

dont you mean [tex]|\langle \psi(t)|z^-\rangle|^2[/tex]?

As Quote:

TSny said:
This is not correct. You want "the probability that the state ##|\Psi(t) \rangle## at time ##t## is in the state ##|z^- \rangle##".

I think I'm starting to understand, the fact that it says the state at t=0 is in Z+ is irelevant right? once time t has passed the state will abide by the superposition of states originally found in Q1)?
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Lengalicious said:
By any chance is this what your thinking of?
[tex]|\Psi(t)\rangle=e^{{-itE_{1}/\hbar}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|z^{+}\rangle+e^{{-itE_{2}/\hbar}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|z^{+}\rangle[/tex]

No, this isn't correct. The states that evolve with simple exponential time factors are the eigenstates of the Hamitonian: ##|x^+\rangle## and ##|x^- \rangle##. So, the correct expression is

##|\Psi(t)\rangle = c_1 e^{{-itE_{1}/\hbar}}|x^+\rangle + c_2 e^{{-itE_{2}/\hbar}}|x^-\rangle##.

One approach is to express the x-states in this expression in terms of the z-states (which I think is what you did in your first post when you had expressions for ##|\Psi_1\rangle## and ##|\Psi_2\rangle##) . Then, if you collect together all of the ##|z^- \rangle## terms, you can just read off the probability amplitude for ##|\Psi(t)\rangle## to be ##|z^-\rangle##.

Another approach is to leave ##|\Psi(t)\rangle## in terms of the x-sates and form the probability ##| \langle z^-|\Psi(t)\rangle|^2##
 
  • #10
Lengalicious said:
dont you mean [tex]|\langle \psi(t)|z^-\rangle|^2[/tex]?

##\langle\phi|\psi \rangle = \langle\psi|\phi \rangle^*##,

so ##|\langle\phi|\psi \rangle |^2 = | \langle\psi|\phi \rangle|^2##
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #11
Ok you have helped plenty and I think I can now do this but could you just explain the significance in question iii) where it says "If the system is in state |z+> at t=0", surely this is irelevant to answering the question as I'm just trying to find the probability of finding the time evolved state (which is written in Q1/Q2) within |z->
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Lengalicious said:
could you just explain the significance in question iii) where it says "If the system is in state |z+> at t=0", surely this is irelevant to answering the question as I'm just trying to find the probability of finding the time evolved state (which is written in Q1/Q2) within |z->

When you write the expression

##|\Psi(t)\rangle = c_1 e^{{-itE_{1}/\hbar}}|x^+\rangle + c_2 e^{{-itE_{2}/\hbar}}|x^-\rangle##.

You will need to choose the constants ##c_1## and ##c_2## so that the state will be |z+> at time t = 0.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #13
TSny said:
When you write the expression

##|\Psi(t)\rangle = c_1 e^{{-itE_{1}/\hbar}}|x^+\rangle + c_2 e^{{-itE_{2}/\hbar}}|x^-\rangle##.

You will need to choose the constants ##c_1## and ##c_2## so that the state will be |z+> at time t = 0.

Ahhh ok, well thanks very much for all your help! Much appreciated.
 

What is a qubit system?

A qubit system is a quantum system that can exist in multiple states simultaneously, unlike classical bits which can only exist in either 0 or 1. It is the building block of quantum computers and is represented by a quantum state vector.

How is a qubit system different from a classical bit?

A qubit system can exist in a superposition of states, meaning it can be both 0 and 1 at the same time. This allows for exponentially more information to be stored and processed compared to classical bits, making quantum computers significantly more powerful.

What are time dependent states in a qubit system?

Time dependent states in a qubit system refer to the changing quantum state of the qubit over time. This change is governed by the Schrödinger equation and can be used to manipulate and control the qubit for various quantum computing tasks.

How are time dependent states used in quantum computing?

Time dependent states are used in quantum computing to perform operations and calculations on the qubit. By manipulating the time evolution of the qubit's state, quantum algorithms can be designed to solve problems that are intractable for classical computers.

What are the challenges in maintaining time dependent states in a qubit system?

One of the main challenges in maintaining time dependent states in a qubit system is minimizing the effects of decoherence. This is when the qubit's state is affected by external factors, causing it to lose its quantum properties and behave more like a classical bit. Various techniques such as quantum error correction are used to mitigate this issue.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
343
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
930
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
865
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
583
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
813
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
660
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top