Quenched & Unquenched Quark Model

  • Thread starter Thread starter Naeem Anwar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model Quark
Naeem Anwar
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Just started the study Exotic Hadrons (like mixing of Charmonium states with tetraquarks etc.) and got confused with quenched & unquenched quark model.

What are the major differences between these two models? What key factors I should keep in mind doing calculations with these models invidiously?

I will highly acknowledge literature recommendations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In terms of the path integral (PI) for QCD , since the fermions appear only quadratically, one can symbolically do the functional integral over them to find a highly nonlocal determinant
$$ \int D\psi D\bar{\psi} \exp \left[ \bar{\psi} ( { \not{ \! \! D}} + m ) \psi \right] = \det (\not{\! \! D} + m ) .$$
Since the gauge bosons and consequently the gauge coupling appears in the covariant derivative, if we were doing perturbation theory, we could treat this beast order by order. In the quenched approximation to lattice QCD, this determinant is simply ignored for computational simplicity (its value is set equal to 1 in the PI). We could analogously call this an approximation with nondynamical fermions, i.e. fermions that we don't promote to fields that we have to integrate over in the PI.

I haven't really studied lattice QCD, so I am not up on references. The lecture notes http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0205181 discusses the qualitative aspects of the quenched approximation in one or two places. The notes http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/saalburg/Lectures/wiese.pdf (hat-tip: atyy) are a discussion of ways to incorporate fully dynamically fermions, but I don't think he discusses the quenched approximation in any detail.
 
Although my background is not LQCD but still this material is at least giving me the spirit of my query. Thanks & looking forward some exact explanations in detail.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top