Queries on Damped Harmonic Motion

AI Thread Summary
In Damped Harmonic Motion, the position function is expressed as x(t) = (A)(e^(-bt/2m))cos(ωt + ϕ), leading to modified parameters A' and ω'. The question arises whether the maximum acceleration can be represented as (A')(ω')^2. The discussion indicates that this statement is not accurate, as differentiating the damped motion function results in a more complex expression involving both sine and cosine components. It is noted that for small damping, the acceleration can be approximated, but the original intuition about the maximum acceleration being represented by (A')(ω')^2 is confirmed to be incorrect.
LameGeek
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
So we know that SHM can be described as:
x(t) = Acos(ωt + ϕ)
v(t) = -Aω sin(ωt + ϕ)
a(t) = -Aω^2 cos(ωt + ϕ)

it can be easily said that the max acceleration (in terms of magnitude) a SHM system can achieve is Aω^2

In Damped Harmonic Motion we know that:
x(t) = (A)(e^(-bt/2m))cos(ωt + ϕ)

given that:
A' = (A)(e^(-bt/2m))
ω' = sqrt( (ω^2) - (b/2m)^2 )

Is it true that the max acceleration at any given time is (A')(ω')^2?

My intuition tells me that the above statement is not true =/
because differentiating the function x(t) = (A)(e^(-bt/2m))cos(ωt + ϕ) gives me a complex function (which has sine & cosine in it) & it doesn't really give me anything close to the (A')(ω')^2 term
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is easier using complex numbers.

For damped motion, ##x(t)## = the real part of ##Ae^{(-s + i\omega')t}## where ##s## is your ##b/2m##. Note, ##A## is a complex constant (to account for your phase angle ##\varphi##) and of course ##e^{i\theta} = \cos\theta + i\sin\theta##.

So ##a(t)## = the real part of ##(-s + i\omega')^2 x(t)##

Your intuition is right, but if the damping is small, ##(-s + i\omega')^2## is close to ##-\omega^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I'm not really familiar with complex numbers (other than i^2 = -1) but your explanation does makes some sense to me. Thank You! =)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top