Question about a Carl Zeiss lens

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FocusedWolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lens
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the specifications and characteristics of a Carl Zeiss lens, specifically the "Tessar 2.0/3.7" lens from a Logitech webcam. Participants seek to understand the implications of the lens's specifications for their college senior project, particularly regarding field of view and focal length calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the interpretation of the lens specifications, suggesting that "3.7 mm" refers to focal length rather than diameter.
  • Another participant clarifies that "f2.0" is the focal ratio, which is the focal length divided by the diameter of the lens, and proposes that the focal length is actually 7.4 mm.
  • Some participants discuss the relationship between aperture and focal ratio, noting that aperture is often used interchangeably with focal ratio in photography contexts.
  • There is a suggestion that the entrance pupil diameter at f2.0 would be 1.85 mm if 3.7 mm is indeed the focal length, though some express skepticism about this measurement.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the diameter of the lens should not be considered in isolation, as it does not directly correspond to the focal length or maximum aperture due to various optical losses.
  • Participants discuss the importance of knowing the size of the CMOS sensor to accurately calculate the field of view, with references to specific sensor dimensions and resolutions from other sources.
  • One participant shares links to external resources for further information on the CMOS sensor and calculations related to angles of view.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the lens specifications, particularly regarding the relationship between focal length, diameter, and aperture. There is no consensus on the exact meanings of the terms used or the implications for the field of view calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions of terms like "aperture" and "focal ratio" remain unresolved, and there are varying interpretations of the lens specifications that depend on the context of use. The discussion also highlights the need for precise measurements of the CMOS sensor to inform calculations.

FocusedWolf
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Ok so this really has nothing to do with astronomy, besides the use of lens,... but it is a lens question so here goes :P (moderators may move this if their's a more appropriate place for it)

Information printed on the lens: "Carl Zeiss Tessar 2.0/3.7 2MP Autofocus".

This is from a Logitech webcam that my team might be using for our college senior project.

I'm trying to determine as much information as possible about this lens... because knowing the field of view for this lens at different distances is critical for our project. So anything and everything about "Tessar 2.0/3.7" i need to know.

from this webpage, i found a partial explanation of what those numbers sort of indicate: http://www.zeiss.com/C12567A8003B58B9/Contents-Frame/62CB515DD162CAA8C125731D004AC1B7
"They feature a Tessar 3.7 mm, f2.0 autofocus lens that has been optimized for a resolution of 2 megapixels, thus enabling outstanding detail rendition and clarity."

so, I'm guessing here:

3.7 mm lens diameter?

"f2.0" so focal length = 2.0 mm?

And if you can point me to some webpage that has formulas for calculating other useful information about lens' in general, then that would be most helpful :P
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
f2.0 is the focal ratio (unitless). Obtained by dividing the focal length by the diameter of the lens. 3.7mm is the lens diameter. At f 2.0, the focal length is equal to 7.4 mm.
 
2.0 is aperture (that's more or less the same thing as focal ratio, just this name is used more often).
 
Huh?
 
From wiki:

In optics, the f-number (sometimes called focal ratio, f-ratio, or relative aperture[1]) of an optical system expresses the diameter of the entrance pupil in terms of the focal length of the lens; in simpler terms, the f-number is the focal length divided by the "effective" aperture diameter. It is a dimensionless number that is a quantitative measure of lens speed, an important concept in photography.

Aperture is a term that you will find in every camera manual, I don't remember seeing focal ratio used in such places.
 
So we are both agreed that the f ratio is not the aperture itself but is the ratio of the focal length to the lens diameter (or at least the entrance pupil)?
 
I see your point, sorry - I am translating directly from Polish in my head, and there is no distinction between aperture and relative aperture (f ratio) in Polish terminology.
 
3.7 mm is a focal length of this lens. F 2.0 is maximum apperture. Field of view depends of size of film, or in this case cmos or ccd detector. Rule of thumb is that if diagonal of detector is equal to focal length of lens, you will get, what is considered as "normal" angle of view, which coresponds to angle humans have with their vision.
In order to calculate exact angle of view, both horizontal an vertical, you have to know both focal length an exact dimensions of detector you are using.
 
Hmmm. If 3.7 mm refers to the focal length, at f2.0 the entrance pupil would be 1.85 mm diameter. It could be that an entrance pupil this small is used but it looks bigger than that. I'm not convinced.
 
  • #10
chemisttree said:
Hmmm. If 3.7 mm refers to the focal length, at f2.0 the entrance pupil would be 1.85 mm diameter. It could be that an entrance pupil this small is used but it looks bigger than that. I'm not convinced.
Seems about right for a webcam. They're not much more than a mm or two from what I've seen.
 
  • #11
You should never consider diametar of lens. If good people from Carl Zeiss say it is 3.7 mm, F2.0 then it is so. Diametar of lens never exactly coresponds to focal length - maximum apperture ratio, because it also depends on losses which are different for every lens. It is not telescope mirror.
To OP- if you describe your setup more precisely maybe we will be able to help you furthermore.
 
  • #12
S.Vasojevic said:
You should never consider diametar of lens. If good people from Carl Zeiss say it is 3.7 mm, F2.0 then it is so.

Yes, photographic lenses are described by focal length and focal ratio, not diameter. You're convincing me...
 
  • #13
S.Vasojevic said:
3.7 mm is a focal length of this lens. F 2.0 is maximum apperture. Field of view depends of size of film, or in this case cmos or ccd detector. Rule of thumb is that if diagonal of detector is equal to focal length of lens, you will get, what is considered as "normal" angle of view, which coresponds to angle humans have with their vision.
In order to calculate exact angle of view, both horizontal an vertical, you have to know both focal length an exact dimensions of detector you are using.

I'm trying to dig up information on the CMOS sensor.

This is what i have so far:

-- http://forums.quickcamteam.net/showthread.php?tid=265
The QuickCam Pro 9000 has a CMOS-sensor with a resolution of 1600x1200 and its size is 6mm x 4mm (I meassured it). [trying to confirm this persons information].

-- http://forums.quickcamteam.net/showthread.php?tid=107
Sony ClearVid sensor is possibly the CMOS-sensor used in this webcam. If i can find it's specifications then maybe it will indicate it's dimensions for comparison to what that one person measured.

-- From someone on the "QuickCam Team": http://forums.quickcamteam.net/showthread.php?tid=107
"I've talked to one of our optical engineers and I was told that our lab tests confirmed the following values: DFoV = 75° and EFL = 3.7 mm."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
FocusedWolf said:
-- http://forums.quickcamteam.net/showthread.php?tid=265
The QuickCam Pro 9000 has a CMOS-sensor with a resolution of 1600x1200 and its size is 6mm x 4mm (I meassured it).

Thing is that you will have to know active area of cmos, which is not always easy to measure. It is best to find factory specs, then you can go to:
http://imaginatorium.org/stuff/angle.htm"

and easily calculate angles.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K