Question about avogadro's number

  • Thread starter Thread starter busyenergy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Avogadro's number, 6.02 x 10^23, is a constant that represents the number of atoms or molecules in one mole of a substance, not equal to the atomic weight of elements. For water (H2O), one mole contains three atoms (two hydrogen and one oxygen), totaling three times Avogadro's number in terms of atoms. The molecular weight of water is approximately 18 grams, which corresponds to one mole of water molecules, not to Avogadro's number itself. The confusion arises from misunderstanding that Avogadro's number is a counting unit, while atomic and molecular weights are measurements of mass. Clarifying these distinctions is essential for understanding the relationship between Avogadro's number and molecular weights.
busyenergy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I don't understand Avogadro's number when dealing with relative molecular weights.

I understand that the relative atomic weights of the various elements are each equal to avogadro's number. But take for example water, H2O. If Avogadro's number is equal to the relative atomic weight of whatever element, then shouldn't the total number of atoms in H2O be avogadro's number multiplied by 3?

Instead, H2O is equal to avogadro's number for some reason which I don't understand.

Note: I'm not sure if these kinds of questions belong in this part of the forums. It's not a homework problem thought, so I dunno.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Avogadro's number is simply a number, like the number 7. Atoms and molecules are so small that in order to weigh them, we have decided to weigh a large number of them so that the weight is enough to register on a scale. This is where Avogadro's number comes in - it is simply a large number that we all agree to use when we measure atomic and molecular weights, and is equal to 6.02X10^23.

So the weight of an Avogadro's number of atoms or molecules is equal to the atomic or molecular weight of the substance. For hydrogen, an Avogadro's number of atoms weighs about 1 gram. For oxygen, an Avogadro's number of atoms weighs about 16 grams. For water, an Avogadro's number of water molecules weighs about 18 grams, since it is just one oxygen and two hydrogens. Does this help?
 
busyenergy said:
If Avogadro's number is equal to the relative atomic weight of whatever element

Avogadro's number is not equal to atomic weight. Avogadro's number is just a number of atoms, or molecules, or ions, anything like that.

then shouldn't the total number of atoms in H2O be avogadro's number multiplied by 3?

It is - number of atoms (diiferent atoms, some of them being H and others being O) in 1 mole of water is 3 times Avogadro's number. Number of atoms in 1 mole of H2 is 2*NA, in one mole of H2SO4 is 7*NA and so on.

Instead, H2O is equal to avogadro's number for some reason which I don't understand.

You must try to be precise. Water is not equal to Avogadro's number, just like my hand is not equal to square root of 2. I have no idea what you trying to say here, and I guess that's the part of your problem. Try to explicitly and precisely write what you mean.

--
methods
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top