Medical Question about blood transfusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blood
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the compatibility of blood donation between genders and the implications for blood transfusions. It highlights that while a rhesus A+ individual can donate to another of the same type, the differences in blood characteristics between men and women, such as hormone levels and cell concentrations, raise questions about the necessity of considering donor gender during transfusions. Participants note that whole blood is rarely used; instead, blood is separated into components like red blood cells and plasma, which minimizes the impact of hormones. Concerns are raised about patients needing frequent transfusions, such as those with thalassemias, who face risks like iron overload. The conversation also touches on veterinary blood transfusions, noting that dogs can receive one transfusion without crossmatching, while cats require careful matching due to existing antibodies.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272
Althought I understand that a rhesus A+ can donate blood to a rhesus A+, I don't really understand why a woman can donate blood to a man despite the compatibility of the blood group.
As far as I know there are a lot of differences between women and men's blood. For example hormones, the concentration of red cells and platelets, etc.

What about people who need a blood transfusion by week? Do physicians/nurses care about transfusing blood to a patient from a patient of the same sex? Or they don't even look at that?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Whole blood is rarely transferred blood is spun down and separated out into red blood cells, plasma etc

Hormones don't last that long in your body - any extra eostrogen will soon be destroyed
 
mgb_phys said:
Whole blood is rarely transferred blood is spun down and separated out into red blood cells, plasma etc

Hormones don't last that long in your body - any extra eostrogen will soon be destroyed

I see, thanks.
 
If hormones were a problem - a lot of blood transfusions would be contaminated with epinephrine from somebody sticking a big needle in you!
 
From the OP: "What about people who need a blood transfusion by week?"

Folks who have thalassemias (heritable blood disorders) needing frequent transfusions are indeed at risk (and carefully monitored) for iron overload which can be damaging to organs (heart, liver, etc.).

A little side-topic trivia:
Canine blood allows dogs to receive one "free" transfusion without crossmatching because they don't have naturally occurring antibodies against all the other canine blood types. After the first transfusion, however, dogs can develop those antibodies and must be crossmatched thereafter. Cats do have antibodies against the blood types they are lacking and should be carefully matched and transfused from the start. And then there are the multiple blood types of horses...:-j
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Back
Top