Question about "bound systems"

  • Thread starter Thread starter ORF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Systems
AI Thread Summary
In a bound system of particles, the movement of the center of mass (CM) can be separated from the particles' relative movements under certain conditions. This separation is possible when the potential energy can be divided into components that depend solely on interparticle distances and the CM position. External forces acting uniformly on each particle are also necessary for this separation. The discussion raises questions about whether energy can be transferred between the CM and the particles' degrees of freedom, but the consensus is that they can be treated independently under the right assumptions. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing the dynamics of bound systems.
ORF
Messages
169
Reaction score
18
Hello

If we have a system of several particles bound between them, we often separate the movement of CM from the degrees of freedom of the bound system.

Is the degree of freedom of the CM linked to other degrees of freedom of the bound system?
Equivalent questions: can we unbound (untie, unfasten, set free) the particles by giving* energy to the CM?, or vice versa, can we bound "stronger" by draining energy from the degrees of freedom to CM]?

*I don't know what verb is used instead of give; maybe "convey" would be a more specific word.

My mother language is not English, please forgive any mistake.

Thank you for your time :)

Greetings.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ORF said:
Is the degree of freedom of the CM linked to other degrees of freedom of the bound system?

No, for some quite general assumptions, you can separate the movement of the CM from the movement of the particles relative to the CM.
 
Hi!

Thank you for answering so quickly.

What assumptions allow separate the movement of the CM from the movement of the particles relative to the CM?

Greetings :)
 
Essentially it is sufficient that you can split the potential energy into two parts, one that only depends on the interparticle distances, and one that depends only on the CM position. Both may also depend on time, but the interparticle potential changing with time may lead to the system becoming unbound (but still describable separating the CM coordiantes).

This is equivalent to requiring that any external forces acts on each particle with a force proportional to its mass (i.e., giving each particle the same acceleration).
 
Hello

But... that is a tautology, isn't? [except for the detail of potential depending only on the distance and not on its derivatives]

Thank you for your time :)

Greetings
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top