Question about camera lens taking a picture

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dixanadu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Camera Lens Picture
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A camera can capture an image even if half of its lens is covered due to the principle of light rays originating from a single point on the object being photographed. When the lens is partially obstructed, rays from the center of the object still reach the lens and are focused onto the focal plane. The discussion emphasizes that while covering the lens symmetrically affects brightness, non-axisymmetric obstructions lead to advanced optical techniques such as Foucault knife-edge test, Schlieren imaging, and aperture synthesis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic optics, including light rays and focal planes
  • Familiarity with camera components, specifically lenses and apertures
  • Knowledge of optical phenomena such as refraction
  • Awareness of optical testing techniques like the Foucault knife-edge test
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of light refraction in optics
  • Learn about the Foucault knife-edge test and its applications in lens testing
  • Explore Schlieren imaging techniques for visualizing light paths
  • Study the effects of aperture synthesis in photography and imaging
USEFUL FOR

Photographers, optical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of light behavior and camera functionality.

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2
Hey guys,

Can someone give a basic explanation of why a camera can take a picture even if half of its lens is covered up?

Thanks guys...
 
Science news on Phys.org
In the image below, the red lines represent light rays from an object directly in front of the lens and located far away so that the light is very nearly parallel when it enters the lens. If you block off the outer rays, perhaps by closing the iris diaphragm, you still have rays entering the camera so you still have an image. Perhaps the key thing to understand is that all of these rays originated from a single point on the object. So if you took a picture of your friend, where the center of the image is at his chest, then these rays all came from a single point on his chest located directly in front of the center of the lens. The rays that came from his nose would be tilted at an angle when entering the lens (imagine tilting all the red rays so that they are traveling downwards slightly). The lens would then focus all of those rays onto a spot at the focal plane further down from the center.

Does that make sense?

optics-kids-lenses-fig1.gif
 
Okay, thank you I think I get it. Also, do the light rays bend due to refraction?
 
Dixanadu said:
Okay, thank you I think I get it. Also, do the light rays bend due to refraction?

Yes they do.
 
Aside: "Covering" the lens is effectively what the iris in the eye or aperture in a camera does. It's primary effect is to alter the brightness of the image.
 
It's worth pointing out that this thread assumes that the lens is covered symmetrically- stopping down or conversely, introducing a central obscuration (catadiopteric lenses). Obscuring the lens in a non-axisymmetric fashion leads to various optical processing techniques, such as:

Foucault knife-edge test
Schlieren imaging
Aperture synthesis
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Andy Resnick said:
It's worth pointing out that this thread assumes that the lens is covered symmetrically- stopping down or conversely, introducing a central obscuration (catadiopteric lenses). Obscuring the lens in a non-axisymmetric fashion leads to various optical processing techniques, such as:

Foucault knife-edge test
Schlieren imaging
Aperture synthesis
agreed, Andy

when I first read the OP stating the lens was 1/2 covered I was considering a blockage coming up say from the bottom so only the top 1/2 was passing light

optics-kids-lenses-fig2.GIF


Drakikith assumed a symmetrical aperture closing arrangement ... not sure if that was what the OP had in mind ?
 
davenn said:
Drakikith assumed a symmetrical aperture closing arrangement ... not sure if that was what the OP had in mind ?

That's a possibility. Still, the basic explanation doesn't change. Rays of light are still getting through even with half the lens covered so there's still an image formed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
OK :) I was trying to visualise that
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K