Question about canonical transformations

[javiergra24]

Hi everybody

I've got a problem related to canonical transformations that I can`t solve:

Given the expression of the canonical transformation

<br /> Q=3q\cdot\big[ \exp\big((p+q)^5\big)+1\big] +3p\cdot \big[\exp((p+q)^5)+1\big]+p<br />
<br /> P=p+q<br />
I have to calculate an associated canonical transformation. Anybody can help me?

Thanks

 

[arkajad]

Are you sure you have stated exactly your problem?

 

[javiergra24]

Exact problems is (from exam):
Given the transformation

<br /> Q=3q\cdot\big[ \exp\big((p+q)^5\big)+1\big] +p\cdot \big[2\exp((p+q)^5)-1\big] <br />

<br /> P=q+p<br />

Modify it slightly in order to be canonical

Answer. After imposing the condition for the Poisson bracket (equal to one) we get the result:
<br /> \boxed{Q=3q\cdot\big[ \exp\big((p+q)^5\big)+1\big] +3p\cdot \big[\exp((p+q)^5)+1\big]+p}<br />

In part two we're asked to obtain an associated canonical transformation. But after reading my books and papers about mechanics I still don't know what's an "associated trasformation mean". Is it the inverse transformation?

 

[arkajad]

OK. Now part of the problem is clear - supposing it is indeed a canonical transformation (I didn't check). But what the author of this exercise means by an "associated canonical transformation" - that I don't know.

 

[gabbagabbahey]

OK. Now part of the problem is clear - supposing it is indeed a canonical transformation (I didn't check). But what the author of this exercise means by an "associated canonical transformation" - that I don't know.

Same here. I suppose the questioner might just be looking for an equivalent transformation, but written in a different functional form... something like

Q=Q(q,P)=3P\left(e^{P^5}+1\right) +P-q and P=q+p
instead of
Q=Q(q,p)=3q\left(e^{(p+q)^5}+1\right)+3p\left(e^{(p+q)^5}+1\right)+p and P=q+p

...but that's just a guess