B Question about Compound Interest Formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the compound interest formula, specifically the significance of the "1" in the equation A(t)=P(1+r/n)^(nt). This "1" represents the initial principal amount, ensuring that the compounded value remains above the principal. Without it, the calculation would yield a value less than the original investment, which would not accurately reflect the growth of the investment. The conversation also touches on the distinction between capital R returns and lower case r for cumulative returns, emphasizing the ease of using log returns for calculations. Understanding the role of the "1" clarifies how interest is applied to both the principal and accumulated interest, reinforcing the concept of compounding.
opus
Gold Member
Messages
717
Reaction score
131
If I have an investment, that is compounded at some rate ##r##, ##n## times per year, it can be written as a function as such:

$$A(t)=P\left(1+\frac{r}{n}\right)^{nt}$$

My question is in regards to the 1 here. I think I have a general idea of what it's for, but I can't really put it into correct words.
What it seems to be doing, is keeping the new compounded value above ##P##. Where if the 1 wasn't there, we would be getting a value less than ##P##. But this seems wishy washy and I'd like to put it into more definitive terms so that I can understand it better. Can anyone help me out with this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If the compounding rate was say 4% per year compounded once per year then the expression would be 1.04 or 104%

Given a hundred dollar loan then with the 104% means after one year we’d need to pay back 104 dollars.
 
  • Like
Likes opus
And under the same circumstances, and removing the 1 from inside the parentheses, that would be just $4. And when we do have the one inside the parentheses, we are adding that $4 to the initial principal investment?
 
Think about it in reverse. So in academic finance you often talk about capital R returns which is A(t+n) / A(t) so the R in the example above is 1.04. Lower case r is then used for the cumulative rate of return which is R-1.

The convenience of thinking about R is that you can then choose any units of time to subdivide you like, and most often you can forget about n and use log returns rather than compound as they are easier to work with so

r annualized = log(R)/t if t is in units of years, for example
 
  • Like
Likes opus
opus said:
And under the same circumstances, and removing the 1 from inside the parentheses, that would be just $4. And when we do have the one inside the parentheses, we are adding that $4 to the initial principal investment?
Yes. You can keep your investment. That is the 1 in the formula.
 
  • Like
Likes opus
Thanks guys.
 
The reason for the parentheses is to show that each iteration gives you interest on the accumulated interest as well as on the principal. That's why it is called compound.
 
  • Like
Likes opus

Similar threads

Back
Top