Question about diagonalizable matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
Suppose that ##A## is a diagonalizable ## n \times n ## matrix. Then it is similar to a diagonal matrix ##B##. My question is, is ##B## the only diagonal matrix to which ##A## is similar?

I have thought about this, but am unsure if my answer is correct. My claim is that ##B## is the only diagonal matrix to which ##A## is similar, up to a rearrangement (or permutation) of the eigenvectors of ##A## in an ordered eigenbasis for ##ℝ^{n}##. Thus, if you rearrange the vectors in your eigenbasis, you will obtain a different diagonal matrix for ##[L_{A}]_{β}## but this will be merely a rearrangement of the diagonal entries of B.

Is this true? If so, how might I go about proving this conjecture of mine?

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's true.

A hint for the proof: the diagonal entries are the eigenvalues of ##A##.
 
If ##A = X^{-1}BX = Y^{-1}B'Y## then ##B = (Y X^{-1})^{-1} B' (Y X^{-1})##.
So if A is similar to two diagonal matrices, then these matrices are similar to each other.
I guess a starting point would be to check which similarity transformations keep diagonal matrices diagonal, and see what you can say about X and Y that way.
 
micromass said:
Yes, it's true.

A hint for the proof: the diagonal entries are the eigenvalues of ##A##.
Not quite. A matrix can be similar to two different diagonal matrices if they have the same numbers on the diagonal in different orders.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Not quite. A matrix can be similar to two different diagonal matrices if they have the same numbers on the diagonal in different orders.

That's exactly what the OP said:

Thus, if you rearrange the vectors in your eigenbasis, you will obtain a different diagonal matrix for ##[L_A]_\beta## but this will be merely a rearrangement of the diagonal entries of B.
 
you might look at the characteristic polynomial.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top