Question about electric potential energy?

AI Thread Summary
Electric potential energy is defined as the work done to move a charge within an electric field, and it is relative to a reference point, typically set at infinite distance. When a positive test charge is placed near a negative source charge, the electric potential energy is negative, indicating that work must be done to separate the charges due to their attractive force. As the distance between the charges increases, the potential energy becomes less negative, reflecting a decrease in attraction and an increase in kinetic energy if the charge moves toward the source. This concept parallels gravitational potential energy, where energy becomes increasingly negative as one approaches a massive object. Understanding that electric potential energy is a signed value helps clarify the dynamics of charge interactions in electric fields.
fahad12
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
basically i don't understand the basic main idea of electric potential energy.
since by definition, energy is ability to do work( to move an object across a distance).
Negative source charge creates a uniform field around itself, and we place a positive test charge very near the source charge. why the electric potential energy so high? this confuses me because the test charge would just stick to source charge and do very little work.
Now for instance image same test charge is place at 10 times farther than its previous location. electric potential energy is very small as r is increase but the test charge did more work because it has moved a greater distance.
also please provide the main idea about electric potential energy
thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The confusing part is electric potential energy is a signed value (positive or negative) and it's not absolute but relative to some point of reference.

For a negative source, the field is considerd negative. For a positve charge in a negative field, the potential energy is a negative value. That would mean that potential energy at a point near the negative source charge would be more negative than a point farther away. If the positive charge was accelerating towards the negative plate (and you ignore issue related to the moving positive charge and the field it generates, and this was in a vacuum), then it's kinetic energy increases, and it's potential energy decreases by becoming more negative.

Note that gravitational potential energy is handled in the same way. For large distances, a common convention is to define a reference point at infinite distance from the gravitational source as zero potential energy, in which case gravitational potential energy becomes increasingly negative as you approach the center of the gravitational source.
 
rcgldr said:
The confusing part is electric potential energy is a signed value (positive or negative) and it's not absolute but relative to some point of reference.

For a negative source, the field is considerd negative. For a positve charge in a negative field, the potential energy is a negative value. That would mean that potential energy at a point near the negative source charge would be more negative than a point farther away. If the positive charge was accelerating towards the negative plate (and you ignore issue related to the moving positive charge and the field it generates, and this was in a vacuum), then it's kinetic energy increases, and it's potential energy decreases by becoming more negative.

Note that gravitational potential energy is handled in the same way. For large distances, a common convention is to define a reference point at infinite distance from the gravitational source as zero potential energy, in which case gravitational potential energy becomes increasingly negative as you approach the center of the gravitational source.
this means that the conservatin of energy holds here. But what doesn't more negative electric potential signifies.
thanks for your concise response
 
Hold on, did you know there is a difference between Electric Potential and Electric Potential Energy?
 
Good catch, Drakkith.
 
Negative source charge creates a uniform field around itself, and we place a positive test charge very near the source charge. why the electric potential energy so high? this confuses me because the test charge would just stick to source charge and do very little work.

Let's start with the definition first:

The reference zero for potential energy is usually at infinite separation and particles are at rest. The electric potential energy of a system is relative to this zero and positive work must be done to bring like (opposing) charges together. [You could define this other ways but this is the agreed upon convention.]

As Post#2 notes, gravitational potential energy is handled the same way.

Placing a positive charge near a negative charge, where the attraction becomes stronger, is of opposite sign to placing two charges of the same sign together, right?

In your example, placing a positive charge near a negative charge, means potential energy is negative...the forces are attractive...you have to do work to keep the charges separated.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top