Question about electrons and how we interact with them

  • Thread starter Thread starter DARTZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons
AI Thread Summary
Electrons create a repulsive force that prevents solid objects from passing through each other, as seen when sitting on a chair. The discussion explores the theoretical scenario of a body with a positive charge and whether it would stick to normal matter, suggesting that ionic bonding could occur. However, it emphasizes that the stability of matter is primarily due to the exclusion principle rather than electromagnetic forces. A counterpoint is raised regarding misconceptions about electron-nucleus interactions and the application of the exclusion principle. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of atomic interactions and the fundamental principles governing matter stability.
DARTZ
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Okay from what I know electrons are what we touch (repel) when we are holding normal solid matter. For example, when I am sitting on a chair the electrons of my body or repelling the electrons of the chair making me hover and not go through the chair.

Now, since electrons have a negative charge, theoretically speaking if my body was to have an all positive charge, would I stick to normal matter? Why is it positively charged masses don't stick to normal matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
great question. I am going to say yes. that would be ionic bonding on a large scale. but that is not the only reason why we don't fall through the chair; the chair itself exerts a force on us in an equal and opposite direction.
 
"A seminal work by Dyson came in 1966 when, together with A. Lenard and independently of Elliott H. Lieb and Walter Thirring, he proved rigorously that the exclusion principle plays the main role in the stability of bulk matter [10]. Hence, it is not the electromagnetic repulsion between electrons and nuclei that is responsible for two wood blocks that are left on top of each other not coalescing into a single piece, but rather it is the exclusion principle applied to electrons and protons that generates the classical macroscopic normal force."
 
DARTZ said:
theoretically speaking if my body was to have an all positive charge, would I stick to normal matter?

Theoretically, I think that you would explode.
 
Freeman Dyson said:
"A seminal work by Dyson came in 1966 when, together with A. Lenard and independently of Elliott H. Lieb and Walter Thirring, he proved rigorously that the exclusion principle plays the main role in the stability of bulk matter [10]. Hence, it is not the electromagnetic repulsion between electrons and nuclei that is responsible for two wood blocks that are left on top of each other not coalescing into a single piece, but rather it is the exclusion principle applied to electrons and protons that generates the classical macroscopic normal force."

Is that a quote from somewhere? There are two very obvious wrong things there: electrons and nuclei don't repel each other, and the exclusion principle is only applied between identical particles, not between electrons and protons.
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
990
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top