Question about finding quantom numbers N_(n) for Schrodinger Eqn in 3D

AI Thread Summary
To find the quantum numbers n_(1), n_(2), and n_(3) for the Schrödinger equation in three dimensions, start by determining the energy levels associated with different quantum states. The process involves selecting initial quantum numbers, calculating the corresponding energy values, and then arranging these states in order of energy. For the fourth excited state, one would calculate energies for combinations of quantum numbers, such as E_(112), E_(121), and E_(211), and continue this pattern. The minimum energy state typically occurs at n_(1)=1, n_(2)=1, n_(3)=1, with subsequent states derived from nearby quantum number combinations. This systematic approach allows for the identification of energy levels in both cubic and non-cubic boxes.
A$APFowler
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm using the Modern Physics by Tipler (6th edition) book.
In sec 7.1 it talks about the first excited state being either E_(112 ) E_(121 ) E_(112).

My question is what is the process of finding the n_(1),n_(2),n_(3) quantum numbers ? How i understand you pick random values and from their find the order of energy levels. Can you give the process if would take of finding let's say the 4th excited state for both a cubic and non cubic box.

Thank you for your time.

PS: I apologize if my format is incorrect this is my fist post. The "_" represent subscript.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if the energy dependence on the quantum numbers were somehow more complicated, you could for example calculate the gradient to find some minimum values, and go from there. In this case, the minimum is trivially at 1,1,1. After you have that sorted, then all you can really do is calculate the energies for nearby quantum numbers. So you'd find E111, E112, ... , E122, E212, and so on. Then you just arrange the states according to their energy.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top