Question about gcd and Mersene Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter ~Death~
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gcd Numbers
~Death~
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've been going through an intro number theory book and trying to prove everything

but I am stuck on this one exercise

it says to show that gcd(M_e,M_f)=M_gcd(e,f) for all positive integers e and f

where M_n=2^n-1.

Is there a simple proof for this?

I see these questions a lot where youre given some aribtrary function and asked to show something about the gcd ...are there any tips for how to do these?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
so far I've proved that if a|b then M_a|M_b using the identity x^k-1=(x-1)(x^(k-1)+...+1)

so I have now M_gcd(e,f)|M_e and M_gcd(e,f)|M_f

but I'm not sure how to show that it's actually the GREATEST common divisor
 
Last edited:
Ok I think I proved it

if d|M_e and d|M_f then

d|xM_e+yM_f for ANY integers x,y and by properties of gcd there exists

integers x',y' such that x'M_e+y'M_f=gcd(M_e,M_f) so then d|gcd(M_e,M_f)
 
2^{da}-1=(2^d-1)(1+2^d+...+2^{d(a-1)})

The same applies for 2^{db}-1. So obviously \gcd(M_{ad},M_{bd}) \geq 2^d-1.

Now, suppose k|1+2^{d}+..+2^{d(a-1)}=A and k|1+2^d+...+2^{d(b-1)}=B. If you invent some new notation by linearly combining A and B and use the fact that k is odd you can conclude that k|1. It takes some time so I won't post it here. Just a tip.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top