B Question about Gravity according to GR: Earth Rises, Time Axis Curves

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter TheQuestionGuy14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr Gravity
TheQuestionGuy14
Messages
158
Reaction score
8
Recently I watched a video on Gravity according to General Relativity. The video shows that the Earth rises up to catch the apple, what does this mean? It also shows the time axis being curved as the apple falls. Doesn't this mean that with enough time falling, the time axis will curve into a circle, making a Closed Timelike Curve?

Here is the video:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheQuestionGuy14 said:
Recently I watched a video on Gravity according to General Relativity. The video shows that the Earth rises up to catch the apple, what does this mean? It also shows the time axis being curved as the apple falls. Doesn't this mean that with enough time falling, the time axis will curve into a circle, making a Closed Timelike Curve?

The last part of the video clearly shows the paths being open, not closed.

Also, it doesn't imply that the Earth "rises up" to meet the apple. It shows that the surface of the Earth and the apple have different worldlines that intersect. You shouldn't think of either of these as "absolutely" moving. It's just an illustration.
 
TheQuestionGuy14 said:
It also shows the time axis being curved as the apple falls. Doesn't this mean that with enough time falling, the time axis will curve into a circle, making a Closed Timelike Curve?
This is a good question. It shows that you are really thinking this through.

Indeed, if you have a flat piece of paper then curves of constant curvature form circles. However, spacetime is different. In flat spacetime curves of constant curvature in time form hyperbolas with asymptotes at c. This is due to the minus sign in the metric.
 
  • Like
Likes TheQuestionGuy14
TheQuestionGuy14 said:
Recently I watched a video on Gravity according to General Relativity. The video shows that the Earth rises up to catch the apple, what does this mean?
It has no physical meaning, it's just how the diagram is spread out in the plane. Look at the rolled up version at 1:10min in the video, where the lowest space coordinate (Earth's surface) is at the same height everywhere.

TheQuestionGuy14 said:
Doesn't this mean that with enough time falling, the time axis will curve into a circle, making a Closed Timelike Curve?
No, to represent more time in the initial flat diagram, you would have to start a new layer every time you come around. This is a purely an illustration layout issue, and has nothing to do with the actual physics.

To understand it better check out the links in the video description (click "MORE INFO" below the video).

See also these:



 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes TheQuestionGuy14
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top