Question about gravity and forces acted upon

  • Thread starter Thread starter deuce123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Gravity
AI Thread Summary
Gravity exerts a downward force on objects on Earth, while those objects simultaneously exert an upward force on the Earth, illustrating Newton's Third Law of Motion. This law states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction, which can be counterintuitive. When an object rests on the ground, the ground pushes up against it, balancing the gravitational pull. Additionally, from the object's perspective, its gravitational pull also affects the Earth, creating a reciprocal relationship. Understanding these forces clarifies the interaction between gravity and objects on Earth.
deuce123
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

My professor said that since gravity pushes down any object on earth, the objects themselves push up against earth. Intuitively this is difficult too grasp, can anyone give an example or anything to help me out. Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
deuce123 said:

Homework Statement

My professor said that since gravity pushes down any object on earth, the objects themselves push up against earth. Intuitively this is difficult too grasp, can anyone give an example or anything to help me out. Thank you
This is Netwons's Third Law, two object exert force on each other in equal magnitudes but in opposite directions.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Newt.html
So try to think this way and consider their masses and due to force their accelerations.You ll see that it makes sense.
 
deuce123 said:

Homework Statement

My professor said that since gravity pushes down any object on earth, the objects themselves push up against earth. Intuitively this is difficult too grasp, can anyone give an example or anything to help me out. Thank you

I figure it would be a bit clearer if said as: "earth's gravity pulls down any object and if the object is stopped from falling because it is resting on the surface, or something else supported by the surface, that's what is pushing up against the object, with an equal and opposite force. Although perhaps he also meant, a bit counter-intuitively, that looking up from the object's point of view, since the pull of gravity goes both ways, the gravity of the object is also pulling the Earth down. In any case, I'd make a case for there being a bit of ambiguity there.
 
Austin Hook said:
the gravity of the object is also pulling the Earth down.
That might be a bit confusing. I guess you mean "down" from the point of view of the object's gravitational field, i.e. up towards the object in terms of normal up and down.
 
Yes, that's what I was saying. Just speculating if there were even some unlikely ambiguity in the original statement.
 
Thank you everyone!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top