Question about Green, Schwarz, Witten Appendix 4.A on N=1SYM

  • Thread starter Thread starter petergreat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Green
petergreat
Messages
266
Reaction score
4
It's really just a dumb question about spinors. The book says that for N=1 SYM, in 3 or 4D we use Majorana spinors. In 6D we use Weyl spinors. And in 10D we use Majorana-Weyl spinors, so that the number of fermionic states matches D-2.

My questions is, in 4D, Weyl spinors (chiral spinors) also have only 2 degrees of freedom. Why must we use Majorana spinors instead?

In which dimensions do Majorana spinors exist? And which dimensions allow Majorana-Weyl spinors? What are the gamma matrices in these representations? What's the best reference for these issues?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a short review, I would suggest the appendix of the 2nd volume of Polchinski's book.
 
Sorry for the late post.

It's got to do with the representation theory of Clifford Algebras and its modulo 8 (Bott) periodicity.
Some references are:
Clifford Algebras in Physics: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0506011
The Pin Groups in Physics: C, P, and T: http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0012006
http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/TrigramsAndRealCliffordAlgebras/

The first one is a nice clear short discussion that should answer all of the questions you posed in your post. The second reference has some really interesting material by some of the people most knowledgeable about this stuff. The final reference is just some pretty pictures that I made.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top