Question about Inertia: Force to Overcome Mass of 1kg?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Macrobe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia
AI Thread Summary
To overcome the inertia of a 1 kg mass, the force required depends on the desired acceleration, as defined by Newton's second law (F = ma). Specifically, 1 Newton of force will accelerate a 1 kg object at 1 m/s². However, if the object is stationary on a flat surface, the force needed to initiate movement must also account for static friction, which is calculated as the coefficient of static friction multiplied by the object's weight. On a typical road surface, this force is approximately 0.7 times the weight of the object. Understanding these dynamics clarifies the relationship between mass, force, and motion.
Macrobe
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have a question regarding Inertia. Exactly how much force, in Newtons, is required to overcome the inertia of exactly one kilogram of mass? It seems to me there must be some sort of quantity for it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on how fast you want to accelerate the object. The equation is ##\vec{F_{Net}} = m\vec{a}##, or in words, (net force acting on the object) = (mass of the object) x (acceleration of the object). This is Newton's second law. It takes, for example, 1 Newton of force to accelerate a 1kg object at 1m/s2.
 
Ah. Okay...not exactly what I was looking for, but what I was looking for was probably wrong ;) thanks.
 
Yes, if you were looking for some measure of a force required to overcome inertia that is independent of acceleration, then there's no such thing.
 
yeah, it is pretty counter-intuitive that f=ma, because in our everyday lives, most of the time there are frictional forces.
 
I think Macrobe meant to ask how much force would be required to get a body off its stationary position. On a flat surface, it is equal to the co-efficient of static friction x Weight of the body (weight, not mass). If the body is on, say, a road, the force required to get the body would be around 0.7 times the weight of the body.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top