I Question about L(v^2) Notation in Landau & Lifshitz's Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the L(v^2) notation in Landau & Lifshitz's Mechanics, specifically on pages 4-5. It clarifies that L is a function of the velocity vector v, not dependent on position r or time t. The notation indicates that L is expressed as a function of the magnitude of the velocity squared, |v| = √(v^2). This understanding helps in deriving related equations, such as equation (3.1). The conversation emphasizes the importance of grasping this notation for further comprehension of the mechanics presented in the book.
hagopbul
Messages
397
Reaction score
45
Hello :

i am reading now landau & lifshitz book on mechanics and i have small question :

about L(v^2) notation it was not very clear in the book and i couldn't understand it correctly anyone can explain it or provide a link with explanation
page (4 - 5)

Best regards
Hagop
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a problem to derive (3.1) ? I understand :

L is function of only ##\mathbf{v}##, not of ##r## and t. Further L is function of ##|\mathbf{v}|=\sqrt{v^2}##. Thus L is function of ##v^2##.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes hagopbul and vanhees71

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Trouble understanding coordinates for the Lagrangian
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Understanding the Coordinates in the Lagrangian for a Pendulum
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Why Lagrangian includes 1/2m by Landau?
Replies
24
Views
2K
Error in Landau Lifshitz Mechanics?
Replies
10
Views
5K
I Using reference frames for derivation of Lagrangian
Replies
25
Views
3K
I Trouble simplifying the Lagrangian
Replies
2
Views
1K
A Error in Landau-Lifshitz Vol 2, Fig. 20, page 310
Replies
7
Views
734
How kinetic energy is proportional to velocity squared
Replies
15
Views
3K
I Why L=L（v^2) in inertial reference system?
Replies
2
Views
813
Classical What Lagrangian mechanics textbook should I use?
Replies
8
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top