Question about lanthanides and actinides

  • Thread starter Thread starter mickeyw
  • Start date Start date
mickeyw
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a question about lanthanides and actinides... is there any reason that they broke both the lanthanides and actinides from the periodic table?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mickeyw said:
I have a question about lanthanides and actinides... is there any reason that they broke both the lanthanides and actinides from the periodic table?
That is not necessarily the case. This website - chemlab.pc.maricopa.edu/periodic/periodic.html - has alternative forms of the periodic table, however there seems to be some problem with it at the time this is posted. But the main idea is that there are alternate forms that do not 'break out' the lathanides and actinides. They are grouped however for reasons of similarity in some chemical properties. For example, the lanthanides tend to form 3+ valences, and so the oxides are generally M2O3. The atomic radii are fairly close for the lanthanides and actinides - http://www.webelements.com/webelements/properties/text/image-balls/atomic-radius-emp.html

The transitional metals fall nicely between alkali Earth's and poor metals and metalloids - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table for an explanation.

See also http://www.webelements.com/.

One could put the lanthanides and actinides (periods 6 and 7, respectivley) between groups 2 and 13, but then the table would be very wide. See - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table_%28wide%29
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They broke them off just so that the periodic table would look nicer. If they we all together they would have to be in the middle of two other rows (as opposed to having two rows of their own) and thus the periodic table would be impracticably long and hard to print.
 
y thanx! :biggrin:
 
why the last electron of the element lanthanum enters the d orbital instead of entering the f orbital ?Same in actinum ? Why ?
 
http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/La/econ.html
There is a really cool flash (9) player for electron configs. One can browse by Z.

Ostensibly the 5d1 level is at a lower energy state than 4f1. Cerium (Z=58) then has 5d14f1, but praseodymium (Z=59) has 4f3.

Then Gd (Z=64) has electronic config [Xe].4f7.5d1.6s2, and all the 4f electrons are unpaired. Gd has some interesting magnetic properties.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top