Question about limit of series

  • Thread starter Thread starter JG89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Series
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the limit of the series 1/n^2 + 1/(n+1)^2 + ... + 1/(2n)^2 approaches 0 as n approaches infinity. It is clarified that simply stating each term converges to 0 is insufficient due to the indeterminate form of infinity multiplied by zero. A comparison to a P-series is suggested, noting that while each term decreases, the total number of terms affects the convergence. The argument is strengthened by applying the Squeeze theorem, demonstrating that the series converges to 0 by bounding it with a converging series. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the original series does indeed converge to 0.
JG89
Messages
724
Reaction score
1
This isn't a homework question, it's a question I encountered during self-study.

It said prove that the limit as n approaches infinity of 1/n^2 + 1/(n+1)^2 +...+ 1/(2n)^2 = 0

Is it sufficient to say that each term converges to 0 as n approaches infinity, and so the entire sum must also approach infinity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, because infinity*0 is an indeterminate form. You'll have to sum the series and take the limit properly (or perhaps find something more creative).
 
I think you can compare all terms in the series to a P series 1/n^2, which diverges.

Each successive term in the series, an < an+1 < an+2, etc... is declining and all are <= the first term.

So that argument should be OK, without knowing anything else about the series.

Jeff
 
I understand that infinity*0 is indeterminate, but if each term converges to 0, wouldn't the sum look like 0 + 0 + ... + 0? Making the entire thing 0?
 
While that appears to be true at first, it is not always true. Consider the function:

f(n) = 1/n + 1/(n+1) + 1/(n+2) + ... + 1/(2n)

The smallest term in this sum is 1/(2n). There are a total of n+1 terms. This means that the sum f(n) > (n+1)/(2n) = 1/2 + 1/(2n) > 1/2 for n >= 1. Thus, it doesn't matter what value of n we have, f(n) is always greater than 1/2.

Yet, in this example, each of the terms tends to 0 as n tends to infinity. What matters is how fast the terms go to 0 compared to how many terms there are.
 
JeffNYC said:
I think you can compare all terms in the series to a P series 1/n^2, which diverges.
You meant "converges" here, didn't you?

Each successive term in the series, an < an+1 < an+2, etc... is declining and all are <= the first term.

So that argument should be OK, without knowing anything else about the series.

Jeff
 
Ben's already implied this, but I though i'd weigh in on this: Try Squeezing it.
 
Tedjn said:
What matters is how fast the terms go to 0 compared to how many terms there are.


Could you please expand on this?
 
Alright. How about this.

0 < 1/n^2 + 1/(n+1)^2 + ... + 1/(2n)^2 < 1/n^2 + ... + 1/n^2 [There are n+1 terms]

1/n^2 + ... + 1/n^2 = (n+1)/n^2 = 1/n + 1/n + 1/n^2, which converges to 0. Thus the original sequence must also converge to 0.
 
  • #10
Yes, you nailed it.
 
Back
Top