Question About Long Division of Polynomials

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kyphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Division Polynomials
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of polynomial long division, specifically addressing the need to include terms with a coefficient of zero for missing powers in the dividend. Participants explore the rationale behind this practice and compare it to traditional long division.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that adding 0x^n helps avoid mistakes during subtraction in polynomial long division.
  • Others argue that including 0x^n does not affect the final answer but serves as a way to maintain the structure of the polynomial.
  • One participant compares the inclusion of zero terms in polynomials to the place value system in decimal long division, indicating that it helps clarify the position of each term.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the zero does not change the value of the polynomial but is necessary for clarity in the division process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that adding 0x^n is beneficial for clarity and avoiding errors, but there is no consensus on whether it is strictly necessary or if it affects the outcome of the division.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve whether the inclusion of zero terms is essential or merely a helpful convention, leaving the necessity of this practice open to interpretation.

kyphysics
Messages
685
Reaction score
445
Dividend: 4x^3 - 6x - 11
Divisor: 2x - 4

In this problem above, the dividend lacks a variable to the second power, so we have to add a 0x^2 to make it:

4x^3 + 0x^2 - 6x - 11

Question:

Why do we add 0x^n? (n = missing powers)

In regular long division, we do no such thing. Why do we have to add these extra variables into the dividend in polynomial long division?

TVM!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know. I don't.

Edit: It is probably to help perform the subtraction. If you don't add it you subtract from zero anyway. So writing it might help to avoid mistakes.
 
Like the post above says, I think it's only to avoid error ( especially while learning it as a student). Wouldn't actually affect your answer in any way.
 
You "add" 0, which means you do not change anything. In regular long division, the 0 would be there already to indicate the right places, in polynomials, you don't need to write +0x2 explicitely because every term has its meaning independent of where it is located.
 
kyphysics said:
Dividend: 4x^3 - 6x - 11
Divisor: 2x - 4

In this problem above, the dividend lacks a variable to the second power, so we have to add a 0x^2 to make it:

4x^3 + 0x^2 - 6x - 11

Question:

Why do we add 0x^n? (n = missing powers)

In regular long division, we do no such thing. Why do we have to add these extra variables into the dividend in polynomial long division?

TVM!
Sure we do. That's what zero is for.

If you want to do long division of 3065 by 42, the place value system we use to write decimal numerals is as follows:

3065 = 3 × 103 + 0 × 102 + 6 × 101 + 5 × 100

or

3065 = 3x3 + 0x2 + 6x + 5, where it is understood x = 10.

It's a similar situation when certain terms are missing from a polynomial dividend.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jenniferAOI
SteamKing said:
Sure we do. That's what zero is for.

If you want to do long division of 3065 by 42, the place value system we use to write decimal numerals is as follows:

3065 = 3 × 103 + 0 × 102 + 6 × 101 + 5 × 100

or

3065 = 3x3 + 0x2 + 6x + 5, where it is understood x = 10.

It's a similar situation when certain terms are missing from a polynomial dividend.

Got it! Thanks.
 
SteamKing said:
Sure we do. That's what zero is for.

If you want to do long division of 3065 by 42, the place value system we use to write decimal numerals is as follows:

3065 = 3 × 103 + 0 × 102 + 6 × 101 + 5 × 100

or

3065 = 3x3 + 0x2 + 6x + 5, where it is understood x = 10.

It's a similar situation when certain terms are missing from a polynomial dividend.
wow. Did not see that either. thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K