Stargazing *Question about Mercury, and viewing it from various view (binoculars to hubble)

  • Thread starter Thread starter nukeman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hubble Mercury
AI Thread Summary
Mercury appears as a faint star to the naked eye, primarily visible just before dawn due to its proximity to the sun. In binoculars, it remains small and disk-like but lacks significant detail. A small telescope can reveal Mercury's disk shape, measuring around 8-10 arcseconds, allowing for some surface texture observation. Hubble images of Mercury are rare, as the telescope is typically not pointed near the sun. Overall, viewing variations depend significantly on the equipment used, with increasing detail visible through telescopes compared to the naked eye or binoculars.
nukeman
Messages
651
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

Im just starting to get into viewing. I have a question about Mercury though.

Can someone give me an idea of what mercury looks like from the Naked eye, binoculars, telescope, and hubble. Mainly I am trying to get what variations in colour, texture, surface details/features, are noticable with each different view.

Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
By eye it's basically a failry faint star, it's too small to see as planet-like and since it's always so close to the sun you can only generally see it just before dawn.

It's around 8-10" at best so should be visible as a disk in a small telescope, Probably aren't many Hubble photos because you wouldn't want to point the HST that close to the sun!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top