Question about Power and Gravity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of power output in relation to various physical tasks, specifically comparing the work done by individuals during activities like squatting, walking, and climbing. Participants explore how to accurately document and graph power output across different tasks, considering factors such as gravity and the mechanics of movement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to account for gravity when calculating work and power output, noting that squatting involves working against gravity while walking does not.
  • Another participant emphasizes that work is only done when a force acts against another force, such as gravity or friction, and suggests that moving a mass on a level surface does not constitute work.
  • Concerns are raised about how to document power output for various activities like sprinting, with a desire for a method that allows for comparison across different types of physical exertion.
  • Some participants mention the complexity of human biomechanics, including factors like muscle elasticity and energy loss, which complicate simple physics calculations for activities like walking and running.
  • A participant suggests that the power output for climbing can be approximated by considering the increase in potential gravitational energy, while walking involves different energy dynamics.
  • There is a discussion about the need for a formula that incorporates the angle between the force of gravity and the force applied during movement.
  • One participant points out that sports scientists often measure oxygen consumption to estimate power output, referencing methods used to calibrate individuals for accurate measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to calculate power output accurately, particularly regarding the role of gravity and the mechanics of movement. There is no consensus on a single method or formula that adequately addresses these complexities.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in applying simple physics equations to complex human movements, noting that factors such as muscle elasticity, energy loss, and the biomechanics of walking and running complicate calculations. There are also references to the need for empirical data to support theoretical models.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to sports scientists, exercise physiologists, and individuals involved in athletic training or biomechanics, as well as those seeking to understand the relationship between physical exertion and power output.

Ragegame15
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm not a math wiz by any means, so I was hoping someone smarter than I am could help me figure something out.

I'm trying to document the total "work capacity" of an individual across a wide variety of tasks in order to transfer the information to a graph to compare the amount of power generated for a set of task.

On the X axis I want to document the time of effort, and on the Y axis the amount of power output. This is where I'm having issues:

If Work = Force x Distance and Power = Work / Time

If a person A can squat 160kgs and the total distance traveled is 1 meter (.5m on the way down and .5 on the way up) and it took them 3 seconds.
And
Person B weighs 80kgs walks 2 meters in 3 seconds.

By the simple equations above both person A and B did the same amount of work and had the same power output. We know that the person squatting expended more energy and generated more power however.

What am I missing on this equation? Do I need to document gravity since one is working against it and the other perpendicular to it?

If a person climbs up a 3m rope in 10 seconds and walks 3m in 10 seconds they would be generating the same amount of power during both movement with these definitions.

I have seen another work equation that may be helpful but I don't understand how to factor or apply gravity to it.

Work = Force x Distance x Cos(theta)

Where Theta is the angle between the force and distance vectors.

Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work is done only when a force acts, across a distance, against other force, such as gravity (in the case of squatting or rope-climbing) or against friction of the body joints and the elastic forces of the body that have to be overcome by walking.

No work is done by moving a mass on a level surface without friction, however large that mass may be...

I am not sure, but I believe that human (and animal, in general) physical work is measured by indirect means, metering the oxygen consumption or something like that...
 
Yikes, I wonder how I could possibly document that for sprinting and such. The goal is for it to be variable by inputting the weight/height of the individual and being able to track power output throughout long distance runs, sprints, and lifts and graph them all. I still can't figure out how to correlate them all to be apples to apples on the graph.
 
Ragegame15 said:
Yikes, I wonder how I could possibly document that for sprinting and such. The goal is for it to be variable by inputting the weight/height of the individual and being able to track power output throughout long distance runs, sprints, and lifts and graph them all. I still can't figure out how to correlate them all to be apples to apples on the graph.

All that has been extensively researched, not only for athletes, but even for birds... Try to find the data in books or magazines on the physiology of sport...
 
Yes, but most of the articles I am coming across dives pretty deep into heat dissipation, muscle volume and such. I'm wondering if there is anything that would document the power of a runner at a certain weight running a set distance against the time it takes them to do that? Should I be looking for an average friction equation for running applications? I want to be able to plug and play the weight, distance, and time and compare against others and appropriately document it against, say a 1 rep max dead lift or squat.
 
For Power = (Force x Distance x Cos (theta)) / Time

The lifting portion is easy enough for that

I think I need to find a way to get a vector in-between the force of gravity and the force applied toward propelling a human body a said distance in a said time.

Anyone know a formula I can use?
 
Ragegame15 said:
Yes, but most of the articles I am coming across dives pretty deep into heat dissipation, muscle volume and such. I'm wondering if there is anything that would document the power of a runner at a certain weight running a set distance against the time it takes them to do that? Should I be looking for an average friction equation for running applications? I want to be able to plug and play the weight, distance, and time and compare against others and appropriately document it against, say a 1 rep max dead lift or squat.
For a human, and for most animals, the energy invested in walking or running doesn't come only from overcoming internal or external friction, but from keeping on all two (or four) legs. Besides, the muscle elasticity used when running is not perfect, and some energy is lost to heat by those 'springs' that must be replaced. Simple physics equations are not going to solve your problem for the case of simple walking. However, the energy spent in some tasks may be approximated. For example, if you climb up ten stories in one minute, most of the muscular energy delivered by your body will be invested in increasing your body's potential gravitational energy. But moving onself's body with muscular power along a level surface is different...I'm adding below a diagram published in 'Scientific American', in the 70s I believe, in an article titled 'Bicycle Power'. Please note how a man on bicycle needs far less energy that a man walking...

14950810083_e87ac68de2_o.jpg
 
Last edited:
If a person A can squat 160kgs and the total distance traveled is 1 meter (.5m on the way down and .5 on the way up) and it took them 3 seconds.
And
Person B weighs 80kgs walks 2 meters in 3 seconds.
By the simple equations above both person A and B did the same amount of work and had the same power output.

That implies your calculation for the power output by person A was something like

160 x g x 1 / 3

Which suggests you included the power on the way down as well as the way up? In theory the man expends no energy on the way down because gravity moves the weights. It only feels like hard work for the man on the way down because he isn't an "ideal" man. (Aside: I'm assuming he lowers the weights slowly so we can ignore the energy he uses decelerating the weights).

As others have said, you can't calculate the power required when walking the way you have. Walking involves falling forward (which also lowers the centre of mass) then raising that mass back up again. So the centre of mass goes up and down as you go along. Someone has attempted to model and quantify the power expended here. I've no idea how accurate it is..

http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/technote/walkrun.htm
 
PS: I believe sports scientists measure how much oxygen you consume to calculate your power output. Presumably they first calibrate you by putting you on an exercise bike that logs your power output and oxygen consumption rate. Then when running or walking all (?) they have to so is measure your oxygen rate and look up the corresponding power output figure from the exercise bike data. There is a table here..

http://cnx.org/contents/031da8d3-b5...@8.9:50/College_Physics#import-auto-id2767879

Interestingly they say you burn more energy shivering than walking.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K