Question about Quantum + Thermodynamic Perturbation theory

mSSM
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
The following comes from Landau's Statistical Physics, chapter 32.

Using a Hamiltonian
\hat{H} = \hat{H}_0 + \hat{V}
we get the following expression for the energy levels of a perturbed system, up to second order:
E_n = E_0^{(0)} + V_{nn} + \sideset{}{'}{\sum}_m \frac{\lvert V_{nm}\rvert^2}{E_n^{(0)} - E_m^{(0)}}.
The prime signifies that the sum is done over all m\neq n.

Substituting this into the equation (from the normalisation of the Gibbs canonical distribution):
e^{-F/T} = \sum_0 e^{-E_n/T}.

This expression is then logarithmized and expanded in powers of V/T, so that we get:
F = F_0 + \sum_n V_{nn} w_n + \sum_n \sideset{}{'}{\sum}_m \frac{\lvert V_{nm}\rvert^2 w_n}{E_n^{(0)} - E_m^{(0)}} - \frac{1}{2T} \sum_n V^2_{nn} w_n + \frac{1}{2T} \left( \sum_n V_{nn} w_n \right)^2,
where w_n = \exp\left\{(F_0 - E_n^{(0)}/T\right\} is the unperturbed Gibbs distribution.

We can now notice that
\sum_n V_{nn} w_n \equiv \overline{V}_{nn},
i.e., the sum is the mean of V avaraged over the quantum state and the statistical distribution.

And now this is where it gets interesting, and where I fail to see something. Landau writes, that you can rewrite the equation for the free energy above in the following way:
F = F_0 + \overline{V}_{nn} - \frac{1}{2} \sum_n \sideset{}{'}{\sum}_m \frac{\lvert V_{nm}\rvert^2 (w_m - w_n)}{E_n^{(0)} - E_m^{(0)}} - \frac{1}{2T} \left\langle (V_{nn} - \overline{V}_{nn})^2 \right\rangle

That makes perfect sense except for the part with the double-sum, where I don't understand how he obtains it:
\sum_n \sideset{}{'}{\sum}_m \frac{\lvert V_{nm}\rvert^2 w_n}{E_n^{(0)} - E_m^{(0)}}= -\frac{1}{2} \sum_n \sideset{}{'}{\sum}_m \frac{\lvert V_{nm}\rvert^2 (w_m - w_n)}{E_n^{(0)} - E_m^{(0)}}

Is that even correct, or did I miss something? Can you tell me how he gets there? I have also looked up his derivation of the Quantum Perturbation theory, but it does not help me with this particular problem, unfortunately.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Split up the original double sum containing only w_n into two and rename the summation indices n<->m in the second one.
 
Oh dear, thank you so much! I was going crazy over this... :D This is such a silly trick.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top