MHB Question about roots/synthetic division

  • Thread starter Thread starter Madds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Division
AI Thread Summary
The original polynomial is identified as 5x^3 + 6x^2 + 7x + 6, derived from the coefficients used in synthetic division. The root of the polynomial is -1, confirmed by the fact that substituting -1 into the polynomial results in a value of zero. This indicates that (x + 1) is a factor of the polynomial. Synthetic division simplifies the process of finding roots by using coefficients and the value of the root to determine the polynomial's behavior. Understanding synthetic division is crucial for accurately identifying roots and factors of polynomials.
Madds
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
View attachment 7376
According to the synthetic division done below, what was the original polynomial and what number do we know is a root of that polynomial? Explain how you know to receive full points.

I know what the polynomial is, but I thought the root of this polynomial would be 1 but it's actually -1 could somebody explain why?
 

Attachments

  • 20171014_164749-min.jpg
    20171014_164749-min.jpg
    37.2 KB · Views: 101
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When doing synthetic division, the actual root $r$ or zero of the polynomial is put out to the left. Thus we know:

$$f(r)=0$$

And the polynomial function will contain the factor $(x-r)$. This might be why you felt the number needed to be negated?
 
Your question is puzzling. Are you clear on what "synthetic division" is? It is a quick way of dividing a polynomial by x- a for some value of a. Specifically, we write just the coefficients of the polynomial (here that is "5 6 7 6" which tells us that the original polynomial was [math]5x^3+ 6x^2+ 7x+ 6[/math]. The number we are "dividing" by is a= -1. In general, if we divide a polynomial, P(x), by x- a, the remainder is P(a).

The synthetic division here, shows that when x, in this polynomial, is set to -1, the value of the polynomial. is 0. That means that x= -1 is a root.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top