Is Coefficient Pairing in Polynomials Justifiable Through Equality Definition?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the justification of associating coefficients of polynomials with unknowns based on the definition of polynomial equality. It emphasizes that for two polynomial expressions to be equal, their coefficients must match for corresponding powers of x. The participants explore how to express that a polynomial, such as P(x) = ax^2 + bx, has no constant term, suggesting P(0) = 0 as a solution. The conversation also touches on the method of grouping similar powers and setting coefficients to zero to establish equality. Overall, the justification for coefficient pairing relies on the principle that equal polynomials have equal coefficients for corresponding terms.
aikismos
Messages
145
Reaction score
34
Just to double check, but if one wanted to, like in partial fraction decomposition, associate literal coefficients of polynomials with corresponding unknowns on the other side of the equation, the justification for this action is the definition of equality of polynomials?

EDIT: I know this isn't true. Let's see, ## a - b = 2 ## is as far as it can be reduced.
## 3x^2 + bx = ax^2 + 5x \rightarrow a = 3, b = 5 ##

Another related question is how do I express symbolically that in:

## P(x) = ax^2 + bx ##

P(x) has no constant term?

I'm kinda groping around for a rigorous way to express and justify the pairing of coefficients if you were to write them as two equivalent n-tuples.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would put everything on the same side and group similar powers of ##x## like this: ##(3-a)x^2+(b-5)x = 0 ##. Since this is true for all ## x ##, and since ## x ## and ## x^2 ## are independent functions (their Wronskian does not vanish), their coefficients must separately each be zero. This is a lot like having, for arrow vectors in the plane, that ## (3-a)\mathbf{i}+(b-5)\mathbf{j} = 0 ##. The only way to add a vector in the ## \mathbf{i} ## direction to one in the ## \mathbf{j}## direction and get zero is if, in fact, both vectors are the zero vector.

For the second question, how about writing it as ## P(0) = 0 ##?
 
aikismos said:
Just to double check, but if one wanted to, like in partial fraction decomposition, associate literal coefficients of polynomials with corresponding unknowns on the other side of the equation, the justification for this action is the definition of equality of polynomials?

EDIT: I know this isn't true. Let's see, ## a - b = 2 ## is as far as it can be reduced.
## 3x^2 + bx = ax^2 + 5x \rightarrow a = 3, b = 5 ##

Another related question is how do I express symbolically that in:

## P(x) = ax^2 + bx ##

P(x) has no constant term?

I'm kinda groping around for a rigorous way to express and justify the pairing of coefficients if you were to write them as two equivalent n-tuples.
In partial fractions decomposition, you're setting up an equation that is true for all values of the independent variable (except those that make any denominator zero). IOW, two expressions that are identically equal.
So, for ## 3x^2 + bx = ax^2 + 5x##, for all x, it must be the case that a = 3 and b = 5.
 
Thanks guys!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top