Question about the Hamiltonian and the third law of thermodynamics

AI Thread Summary
The third law of quantum mechanics asserts that a system at absolute zero has zero entropy, implying a unique microstate configuration for a given macrostate. While the momentum of particles must be zero, the positions can be shuffled without altering the macrostate, raising questions about the role of particle positions in determining entropy. The discussion suggests that entropy may be influenced primarily by quadratic and higher-order terms in the Hamiltonian. A further inquiry is made into whether there is only one stable spatial configuration for particles at absolute zero, potentially limiting the ability to change positions while maintaining that temperature. This leads to a deeper exploration of the relationship between particle configuration and entropy at absolute zero.
floyd0117
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The third law of quantum mechanics states that a system at absolute zero temperature has zero entropy. Entropy can be conceived as an expression of the number of possible microstates that can produce an identical macrostate. At zero entropy, there should be exactly *one* microstate configuration that can produce the macrostate in question.

For instance, take the following macrostate as an example,

- T = 0
- V = v, dV/dt = 0
- P = p, dP/dt = 0

Indeed the microstate describing this macrostate is unique in quadratic terms (the momentum of every particle must be zero). But it does not seem to be unique in the first-order terms - I can shuffle the positions of the particles all I want and keep producing the same macrostate.

So, by formal definition, is entropy only affected by quadratic and higher order terms of the Hamiltonian of the N particles contributing to the macrostate?
 
Science news on Phys.org
floyd0117 said:
I can shuffle the positions of the particles all I want and keep producing the same macrostate.
Quantum particles are indistinguishable, so shuffling positions gives the same microstate.
 
Dale said:
Quantum particles are indistinguishable, so shuffling positions gives the same microstate.
Okay sure, I should have said to actually change the positions rather than "shuffling" them, so that each position is new and was not realized in the previous configuration.

Edit: could it be that there is in fact only one stable solution to the spatial configuration of a set of particles at T=0? And therefore I cannot change the positions and actually maintain absolute zero temperature?
 
Last edited:
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top