Question about the Landau gauge

  • Thread starter Thread starter lion8172
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauge Landau
lion8172
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I was looking at a derivation of the Landau levels in a crystal, and I had a question about the Landau gauge. The situation under consideration is a two dimensional system of non-interacting particles, exposed to a uniform magnetic field B directed along the z-axis (perpendicular to the plane of the two-dimensional system). In the ''Landau gauge,'' it is claimed that the vector potential can be written as
\vec{A} = - By \hat{x}.
I can see, however, that the vector potential
\vec{A} = - \frac{1}{2}B(x \hat{y} - y \hat{x})
would produce the same magnetic field. My questions are as follows. First, what is the Landau gauge? Secondly, does the selection of this gauge in this case correspond to the assumption that current flows in the x-direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I understand it, the vector potential

<br /> \vec{A} = - By \hat{x}<br />

is the definition of the Landau gauge. It doesn't correspond to any physical assumption - it's chosen just to simplify the calculation. If you choose this gauge, then the operator \hat{p}_x commutes with the Hamiltonian, which means that you can write your solution as \psi(x,y)= e^{ip_xx/\hbar}\phi(y). You can then replace the operator \hat{p}_x in the Hamiltonian by the eigenvalue p_x and you're left with a relatively simple 1D (the variable y) differential equation.
 
Just to supplement what jpr0 said, in the Landau gauge you end up with a harmonic oscillator in y. The other gauge you suggested is called the symmetric gauge, and it is also possible to do the maths in that gauge, and you will get different eigenfunctions. The resolution is that the states are massively degenerate in energy, so the different bases are transformable onto each other.

As a further aside, in the symmetric gauge it's useful to use z=x+iy and then employ some complex analysis. You get the rather (mathematically) pretty result that in the lowest Landau level the wavefunctions are psi = f(z) e^-|z|^2 where f(z) is any analytic function.
 
The potentials mentioned above of course assume that \mathbf{B} points in the \hat{z} direction. Of course, this is merely a coordinate choice. As far as I know, the second "symmetric gauge" that you quoted gives more information about the problem, i.e. as a 2D harmonic oscillator, and in this gauge it is much easier to calculate degeneracies. But the Landau gauge is useful if you want a quick answer.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top