Question about the speed of light and relativity

Carnivroar
Messages
128
Reaction score
1
If light always travels at the speed of light,

and at the speed of light, time stops --

does this mean that light is eternal?

In other words, if you were a particle of light, you would exist forever?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if light doesn't follow the rules of having to travel below the speed of light, then it's likely to say that they don't experience time dilation. If they did, we would literally see every photon everywhere at once.
 
Carnivroar said:
If light always travels at the speed of light,

and at the speed of light, time stops --

does this mean that light is eternal?

In other words, if you were a particle of light, you would exist forever?
Yes, as long as it didn't interact with anything. The cosmic microwave background consists of photons from the big bang (after about 300,000 years, when the universe cooled down enough so the photons would stop interacting). The long wavelength results from the expansion of the universe since then.
 
Carnivroar said:
If light always travels at the speed of light,

and at the speed of light, time stops --

does this mean that light is eternal?

In other words, if you were a particle of light, you would exist forever?

What do you mean by exist forever? Time dilation of relativity means time measurement is dilated i.e. what a man travels near the speed of light would be extremely long via the measurement of a resting man. But there's no point in eternal, eternal is quite like a classical sense. If you can live 90 years, whatever the speed you are travelling, you would live 90 years. Only in classical Newton's "time", there would be "eternality".
 
ZealScience said:
What do you mean by exist forever? Time dilation of relativity means time measurement is dilated i.e. what a man travels near the speed of light would be extremely long via the measurement of a resting man. But there's no point in eternal, eternal is quite like a classical sense. If you can live 90 years, whatever the speed you are travelling, you would live 90 years. Only in classical Newton's "time", there would be "eternality".

I see what you mean. I'm having trouble swallowing the idea of eternity myself.

Let me see if I can rephrase this. Suppose light had consciousness and it was moving at the speed of light (where time supposedly stops?), would it then experience existence forever as long as it's speed remained undisturbed? It would never "age"?

Anyways looks like I found a thread on precisely this, https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=235132, I'm going to read it now.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
93
Views
5K
Replies
72
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top